My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/1/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
7/1/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:17 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:12:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/01/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J U L 1 1981 <br />BOOK 46 FAG -r-762 <br />MR. LINER RESPONDED THAT THE SIZE OF THE SINKING FUND WAS <br />PROPORTIONATE TO THE SIZE OF THE SYSTEM. <br />LENGTHY DISCUSSION AROSE CONCERNING FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS <br />AND THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING CONSISTENT WITH PERCENTAGES. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD -INQUIRED IF THERE WERE ANY ONGOING <br />INSPECTION PROGRAMS ON FRANCHISES IN THE AREA. <br />MR. LINER REPORTED THAT THEY HAVE JUST ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURE <br />WHEREBY ROUTINE INSPECTIONS WILL BE CONDUCTED. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK SUGGESTED THAT AN INSPECTION SYSTEM <br />SHOULD BE ADDED TO FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS, ALONG WITH A FEE SCHEDULE, <br />SO THE COUNTY CQULD RECOUP ITS EXPENSES. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER PRAISED THE FREE MARKET SYSTEM AND <br />BELIEVED IT WOULD BE A BETTER ALTERNATIVE THAN GRANTING FRANCHISES - <br />LET THE FREE MARKET SYSTEM REIGN, AND WHEN IT IS NOT DOING ITS JOB, <br />THEN THE BOARD COULD CONSIDER THE PROBLEM AT THAT TIME AND STEP IN <br />AND HELP THOSE CITIZENS THAT ARE ON THE SYSTEM. HE ALSO FELT THAT <br />PARAGRAPH 4 IN THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION DID NOT CREATE ANY INCENTIVE <br />WHATSOEVER FOR THE PRESENT OWNER OF THE SYSTEM TO MAINTAIN THE SYSTEM <br />OTHER THAN AT A MINIMUM BASE OF $8,000. COMMISSIONER FLETCHER STATED <br />HE WAS OPPOSED TO THE FRANCHISE. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK COMMENTED THAT THE RATE STRUCTURE <br />FOR THE HOBART LANDING FRANCHISE WAS LESS THAN THEY HAD ON THE COUNTY <br />SYSTEM, AND FELT THERE SHOULD BE A SPECIFIC FORMULATOR THE SINKING <br />FUND - ALSO, THERE SHOULD BE EITHER A SEMI-ANNUAL OR ANNUAL INSPECTION <br />OF THE SYSTEMS. <br />THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WAS ANYONE PRESENT WHO WISHED <br />TO BE HEARD. <br />FRED BRIGGS, OF HOBART,BROTHERS, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND <br />COMMENTED THAT THEY HAVE SPENT X10,000 IN THE LAST 6 MONTHS PUTTING <br />IN ANEW HOLDING TANK. ALL OF THE ;PROPERTY OWNERS WERE NOTIFIED OF <br />} <br />THE PROPOSED RATE INCREASE AND THEY HAVE NOT HAD ONE OBJECTION REGARDING <br />THIS MATTER. MR. BRIGGS FELT THEY WERE ASKING FOR A FAIR AND REASON- <br />ABLE RATE IN ORDER TO SET UP A CONTINGENCY FUND SO THEY WILL HAVE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.