My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/1/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
7/1/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:17 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:12:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/01/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />L <br />BOOK 46 PAGE '14,. 6 <br />WHICH LETTER DEFINED THE COVERAGE AFFORDED UNDER THIS POLICY IN CONNEC- <br />TION WITH THE SUIT AGAINST THE COUNTY AND THE ATTORNEY BY TREASURE <br />COAST UTILITIES AND LISTED THE FOLLOWING POTENTIAL COVERAGE ISSUES: <br />1.) F,xclusion 6E of the policy provides that the Company shall <br />not be liable for loss arising, from "inner -o.• c,nider.natien." <br />2.) We note that the County Attc,rney leas been na:,w-1 as a panty <br />to this litigation. if t?:e L.o1,;11L Attorney• is work in on <br />a retainer or contractual a;;reement, no will he <br />available under Policy (:1' 23£56, We would 1 ikv t.� suggest <br />your own professional Iiahili.ty corri.or be r,,-tilied. <br />3.) The plaintiff _.niunctive relief. As !.uch, Exclusion <br />4A and 4B may apply. <br />4.) We nu -[e that the pr oyer incl u.led a puni t iv« ':rims<;e award- <br />Our <br />ward.Our policy does not respond to puniClve �ar::t�e::. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE EXPRESSED GREAT CONCERN ABOUT THE COUNTY <br />HAVING ADEQUATE INSURANCE COVERAGE AND EMPHASIZED THE IMPORTANCE OF <br />HAVING SOMEONE DESIGNATED TO REVIEW THE ADEQUACY OF OUR INSURANCE <br />COVERAGE IN TIME.FOR BUDGET SESSIONS, <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS REPORTED THAT AN INVESTIGATION OF OUR INSURANCE <br />COVERAGE IS UNDER WAY AT THIS TIME, <br />REQUEST BY MOBILE HOME AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR 60 DAY EXTENSION <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER EXPLAINED THAT THE ADDITIONAL TIME IS <br />?SEEDED SO THAT COMMITTEE MEMBERS CAN TOUR THE MOBILE HOME PARKS, VIEW <br />HE CONDITIONS AND PROBLEMS FIRST HAND, AND FORMULATE DATA FOR A <br />FUTURE ORDINANCE, <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER FLETCHER, TO GRANT A 60 DAY EXTENSION AS REQUESTED BY THE MOBILE <br />HOME AD HOC ADVISORY COMMITTEE, <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE STRESSED THE IMPORTANCE OF HAVING A TIME <br />LIMITATION MENTIONED IN THE MOTION, <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD ADDED TO HIS MOTION THAT THE BOARD WOULD <br />GRANT ONLY THIS ONE EXTENSION, AND COMMISSIONER FLETCHER SECONDED, <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION, IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.