Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive Plan Public School Facilities Element <br />School District Capital Funding Sources <br />To address the new construction and renovation needs of the School District's Five -Year <br />Capital Facilities Plan, the School District relies on local and state funding. <br />The School District's primary local funding sources are property taxes, impact fees, and <br />bonds. By Florida statute, school districts may levy up to 2 mills to fund their capital <br />programs. Currently, the Indian River County School District imposes the entire <br />allowable 2 mill levy. In 2005, Indian River County adopted a school impact fee of <br />approximately $1,755.96 for a single family home. Impact fees are collected for new <br />housing to offset a portion of the cost of students generated by new residential <br />development. The School District may also sell bonds or offer certificates of <br />participation (COPs). The District has the capacity to sell $150 million in COPs. <br />Currently, Florida Statutes restrict the School District's portion of state capital outlay <br />funding to specific uses. Expansion projects for student stations may make use of state <br />capital outlay funding sources derived from motor vehicle license tax revenue, known as <br />Capital Outlay and Debt Service funds (CO&DS), and gross receipts tax revenue from <br />utilities Public Education Capital Outlay funds (PECO). <br />ANALYSIS <br />With the data collected from the School District, the County and the municipalities, an <br />analysis was performed to determine the short-term and long-term future conditions that <br />will impact public schools. As part of this analysis, the current inventory of public <br />schools and planned school capital improvements were reviewed in light of projected <br />student growth and available revenue to finance planned capital improvements. <br />Generally, the analysis focused on whether existing and planned school capacity could <br />support residential development at the adopted level of service standard. Specific outputs <br />from this analysis included school capacity figures, a financially feasible adopted level of <br />service, and goals, objectives and policies for the school concurrency program. <br />School Service Areas <br />A fundamental requirement of school concurrency is the establishment of geographic <br />school service areas (SSAs) to which school concurrency is applied when reviewing the <br />impact of new residential development on public schools. The SSAs are used to <br />determine whether adequate capacity is available to accommodate new students <br />generated from residential development. <br />Overall, there are two alternatives for establishing SSAs. One alternative is to establish a <br />district -wide SSA for each school type. This method calculates the district -wide <br />utilization of all schools of the same school type. For example, the district -wide <br />utilization for all elementary schools in school year 2009/10, as identified in Table 12.7, <br />is 88%. This rate was calculated by dividing district -wide enrollment for all public <br />elementary schools by district -wide capacity for all public elementary schools. By <br />Community Development Department Indian River County <br />18 <br />