My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-252A (17)
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2010
>
2010-252A (17)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2022 3:14:37 PM
Creation date
10/5/2015 10:00:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
10/12/2010
Control Number
2010-252A (17)
Agenda Item Number
10.A.3
Entity Name
Comprehensive Plan
Subject
EAR based Amendments 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 2 Future Land Use Element
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
13449
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in corridors, corridor areas contain less sign clutter than other areas. To minimize sign clutter, <br />corridor -type sign regulations should be extended throughout the unincorporated county. <br />Within the county, another cause of visual clutter is temporary signs. Generally, temporary signs <br />are used to advertise political candidates, community events, real estate, and businesses and/or <br />services. Often, temporary signs violate county regulations relating to the location and purpose <br />of such signs. While many temporary signs are placed in public rights-of-way, others are located <br />on private property. To control the visual clutter created by temporary signs, the county should <br />establish limits on where temporary signs are to be allowed, on the number of temporary signs, <br />and on the duration that temporary signs may be posted. <br />Integration of Commercial and Residential Uses <br />Throughout the county, commercial projects and residential projects have been developed with <br />little regard to their integration. Generally, developers of residential projects that border <br />commercial zoning districts install fences and/or landscaping with berms to buffer the project <br />from the adjacent commercial uses. On the other hand, developers of commercial projects that <br />border residential zoning districts are required to provide buffering to protect the existing or <br />potential future adjacent residents. Consequently, vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle access is <br />most often provided to commercial and residential sites primarily along major roadways, with <br />limited or no access provided between adjacent commercial and residential uses. As a result, <br />commercial site design is focused on the major roadway that provides direct vehicular access to <br />the site, with dumpsters and loading docks most often placed in the rear of commercial buildings <br />in locations that face residential property. <br />This separation of commercial and residential uses is practiced nationally as well as locally and <br />is largely the product of zoning regulations that promote the separation of uses for compatibility <br />purposes. That separation of uses results in increased trip lengths, extra miles of driving, added <br />traffic on arterial roads, increased gasoline consumption, and added air pollution. Because of that <br />lack of commercial/residential interconnectivity, pedestrians and cyclists are forced to walk <br />and/or bike long distances through neighborhoods and then adjacent to busy roadways. These <br />longer distances can ultimately discourage people from walking and biking between residential <br />and commercial destinations. Because of those negative impacts, there is a need for the mixing <br />of commercial and residential uses. <br />➢ Opposition to Integration of Commercial and Residential Uses <br />Usually, the lack of integration between residential and commercial sites is due to neighborhood <br />concerns and opposition. Because of concerns related to perceived threats such as cut -through <br />traffic, increased crime, and reduced property values, adjacent residents often oppose the <br />connection of commercial sites to residential areas. Opposing residents often conclude that the <br />perceived threats outweigh the positive impacts of conveniently accessible commercial <br />opportunities and services. <br />Future Land Use Element 101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.