Laserfiche WebLink
Construction Control Line. That relatively narrow strip of land consists mostly of dunes and <br />sandy shoreline. <br />In the future, the county should ensure that allowable densities within the CHHA are not <br />increased. By limiting future development in the CHHA to existing allowable densities, the <br />county will ensure that there will not be any increased risks associated with development in the <br />CHHA. Going forward, the county should also limit capital expenditures for infrastructure within <br />the CHHA to that necessary to maintain the adopted levels -of -service for the existing allowable <br />land use densities and intensities. <br />Finally, the county should recognize the difficulty of evacuating adult congregate living <br />facilities, nursing homes, homes for the aged, total care facilities, and similar developments, in <br />the event of a disaster. For that reason, the county should prohibit new development of such uses <br />within the CHHA. <br />NONCONFORMITIES <br />As defined, a nonconforming lot of record is a lot that met applicable requirements when created but <br />no longer complies with the county's minimum lot width and/or area requirements. Within the <br />county, some existing subdivisions consist almost entirely of nonconforming lots of record; those <br />subdivisions include Vero Lake Estates, Oslo Park, Pine Tree Park, and Paradise Park. In the last <br />few years, a significant amount of new home construction occurred on vacant lots within those <br />subdivisions, particularly Vero Lake Estates. <br />Besides nonconforming lots of record, various nonconforming uses exist in the county. Defined as a <br />use that was lawful when established but would now be prohibited because of the subsequent <br />adoption or revision of local regulations, a nonconforming use is permitted to continue operation <br />unless abandoned for a continuous period exceeding one year. Because adjacent property owners <br />are often affected by a nonconforming use, the county should require that adjacent property owners <br />be notified whenever a staff determination is made regarding the status of a nonconforming use. <br />Within the county, there is one area that was made nonconforming with the 1990 adoption of the <br />Future Land Use Map. That area is a portion of The Moorings, a development located on the barrier <br />island that was constructed prior to the adoption of the county's Future Land Use Map. <br />When The Moorings was developed, the project was structured like a planned development, with a <br />combination of higher density multi -family uses mixed with single-family homes. Although the <br />county, in the 1990 comprehensive plan, designated the entire south barrier island as L-1 (3 <br />units/acre) to reflect the area's almost exclusive single-family development pattern, the county did <br />not address The Moorings multi -family areas, which are zoned RM -10. Because RM -10 is not a <br />zoning district permitted within the L-1 future land use category, the county should expressly allow <br />the existing RM -10 zoning inside The Moorings by establishing a policy to that effect. <br />Future Land Use Element 120 <br />