My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-252A (17)
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2010
>
2010-252A (17)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2022 3:14:37 PM
Creation date
10/5/2015 10:00:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
10/12/2010
Control Number
2010-252A (17)
Agenda Item Number
10.A.3
Entity Name
Comprehensive Plan
Subject
EAR based Amendments 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 2 Future Land Use Element
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
13449
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
flood zone is confined to wetlands and impounded wetlands; however, some development has <br />occurred within the flood zone. Since most of that development is newer, finished floor <br />elevations are above the 100 year flood plain, and wetland areas have been preserved for flood <br />storage. <br />Portions of the barrier island are also included within the flood plains identified by FEMA. <br />While a ridge running almost the entire length of the island has elevations above the flood plain, <br />the land generally east of the dune bluff line and the land along the Indian River Lagoon are in <br />the flood plain. In the unincorporated portion of the county south of Vero Beach, much of the <br />development is located east of SR AIA where flooding would result only in the event of a major <br />hurricane. The area between SR AIA and the Indian River Lagoon is part of the river flood <br />basin. Most development in that area incorporates drainage systems designed for the 25 year/24 <br />hour storm. <br />The portion of the barrier island between Indian River Shores and CR 510 also contains flood <br />prone areas along the Indian River and the beach area. Land uses in that area consist primarily of <br />large residential developments with recreation facilities. Those new developments provide for <br />retention of more than the first inch of runoff before discharging into the Indian River Lagoon. <br />Undeveloped areas west of SR AIA drain directly into the Lagoon. <br />North of CR 510, the flood plain follows the same pattern, except that the northernmost 3 miles <br />of the island are entirely within the flood plain. That area contains the Sebastian Inlet State Park <br />and single family residences along the narrow land mass. The area to the south includes <br />impounded wetlands, the Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge (on numerous small islands <br />within the Indian River), citrus groves, and residential development at SR AIA and CR 510. <br />Two large county beachfront parks also exist in that area. <br />Along the entire barrier island, most development has occurred recently. Consequently, those <br />developments were designed with drainage systems that meet the stormwater management <br />requirements of the county and jurisdictional agencies. Also, much of the barrier island contains <br />excessively drained soils which permit the rapid percolation of stormwater. <br />Within the county, development in flood prone areas has not been a major problem. Because <br />most development in those areas is relatively new, that development meets county stormwater <br />regulations, with structures having higher finished floor elevations. Those characteristics greatly <br />reduce problems associated with flooding. <br />As indicated above, little development that has occurred within flood plains in the county <br />requires redevelopment. For areas with problems, redevelopment can occur in two ways. One <br />approach is to retrofit or expand drainage facilities to improve the capacity of the drainage <br />system. That lessens the likelihood of flooding without extensive property renovation. The <br />second approach requires the renovation or removal of individual structures. It is likely that the <br />second method would occur only in those areas with severe flooding problems or where the <br />economic value of the structure does not warrant the maintenance expense. In Indian River <br />County, the first method (improvement of the drainage system) is the preferred method. Along <br />Future Land Use Element 128 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.