My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-252A (17)
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2010
>
2010-252A (17)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2022 3:14:37 PM
Creation date
10/5/2015 10:00:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
10/12/2010
Control Number
2010-252A (17)
Agenda Item Number
10.A.3
Entity Name
Comprehensive Plan
Subject
EAR based Amendments 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 2 Future Land Use Element
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
13449
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C. Reference in this policy to the terms "parcel, lot or tract" shall not include any alterations <br />to the property's tax parcel legal description that are made after February 13, 1990. <br />Polices: Node size shall be based on the intended use, service area population, existing land <br />use pattern, and other demand characteristics. <br />Polices: Node configuration shall provide for the most efficient use of land, and of <br />transportation and other public facilities and services, while eliminating sprawl and strip <br />development. <br />Polices: No node shall be expanded unless 70% of the subject node's land area (less rights- <br />of-way) is developed with non-residential and non-agricultural uses, or approved for non- <br />residential and non-agricultural development, or otherwise warranted by the proposed <br />development. <br />Otherwise warranted may include but not be limited to the following: <br />• Developed percentage of a node is between 60% and 70% and the node expansion <br />meets one of the following criteria: <br />• expansion of the node is necessary to accommodate the expansion of an <br />existing use where there is not suitable vacant land adjacent to the use within <br />the node, the land proposed for inclusion is owned or controlled by the owner <br />of the site containing the use proposed for expansion, and a finding is made by <br />the Board of County Commissioners that no other land in the node can <br />feasibly accommodate the expansion of the referenced use, or <br />• expansion of an existing node is necessary to adjust a node boundary that <br />splits a small parcel of land and a finding is made by the Board of County <br />Commissioners that development of the parcel is not feasible with the split <br />land use designation and that inclusion of the parcel in the node is more <br />appropriate than exclusion of the parcel from the node. <br />• Expansion of a node is necessary to accommodate a use (such as a regional mall or a <br />large-scale research/technology/industrial park) which has a substantial land area <br />requirement and no alternative suitable sites are available in existing nodes. <br />• Expansion of a node is necessary to compensate for existing or proposed right-of-way <br />which was included within the node boundary and included in the node size <br />calculation, where the node expansion will not exceed the acreage represented by the <br />right-of-way. <br />• Expansion of a node is necessary to accommodate a substantial change in <br />circumstances affecting a property adjacent to the node, where said change has had <br />Future Land Use Element 140 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.