My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-252A (17)
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2010
>
2010-252A (17)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2022 3:14:37 PM
Creation date
10/5/2015 10:00:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
10/12/2010
Control Number
2010-252A (17)
Agenda Item Number
10.A.3
Entity Name
Comprehensive Plan
Subject
EAR based Amendments 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 2 Future Land Use Element
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
13449
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the effect of making the property unsuitable for residential use. Such change could <br />include establishment of an adjacent, incompatible use, or a significant change in <br />adjacent development patterns due to an act of government such as road development <br />and expansion. <br />• Expansion of a node is necessary to include existing adjacent non -conforming <br />commercial or industrial uses where a finding is made by the Board of County <br />Commissioners that the non -conforming uses cannot be otherwise eliminated. <br />• Expansion of a node is necessary to facilitate a swap of land use designations <br />involving more than one node where all involved nodes impact the same public <br />facilities and the swap will not increase the overall land use density or intensity <br />depicted on the Future Land Use Map. The total area added to any expanding node or <br />nodes shall be equal to or less than the total area removed from any other involved <br />node or nodes. <br />• Expansion of a node is necessary to correct an oversight or a mistake in the plan <br />affecting property that meets the following criteria: <br />• the property is residentially designated; <br />• the property was given a residential designation as a result of an oversight or a <br />mistake; <br />• the property is unsuitable for residential use; <br />• the property is adjacent to a node; and <br />• the property is no more than 10 acres in size. <br />Policy 1.25: Commercial/industrial nodes shall not be created or expanded to within 1 '/2 miles <br />of an existing commercial/industrial node. This policy shall apply only to commercial/ industrial <br />nodes that conformed to the 1'/2 miles requirement on December 31, 1997. <br />Policy 1.26: Given the existing concentration of commercial uses in the SR 60/5 81h Avenue <br />commercial/industrial node and the volume of traffic that traverses the SR 60/58th Avenue <br />intersection, the county hereby caps the SR 60/58th Avenue commercial/industrial node at its <br />present size, which is 329.91 acres. <br />Polices: Consistent with the Historic Roseland Neighborhood Plan, the county hereby caps <br />the Roseland/US Highway 1 commercial/industrial node at its present size, which is 135.04 <br />acres. That plan determined that there is sufficient land within that node to accommodate needed <br />commercial and industrial uses for area residents. This limitation on node expansion shall not <br />prohibit the expansion of the node for medical uses. <br />Polices: The Board of County Commissioners may initiate a land use designation <br />amendment to change C/I designated land to residential, provided that all of the following <br />conditions exist: <br />Future Land Use Element 141 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.