My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-252A (17)
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2010
>
2010-252A (17)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2022 3:14:37 PM
Creation date
10/5/2015 10:00:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
10/12/2010
Control Number
2010-252A (17)
Agenda Item Number
10.A.3
Entity Name
Comprehensive Plan
Subject
EAR based Amendments 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 2 Future Land Use Element
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
13449
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Generally, multi -family residential development has occurred in areas designated M-1 and M-2, <br />as well as in some areas designated L-2. In those areas, the density of new multi -family <br />residential projects has been close to the maximum allowed by the L-2, M-1, and M-2 (6, 8, and <br />10 units/acre, respectively) designations. <br />Because the L-1 and L-2 land use categories account for over 75% of residential land within the <br />county, the county needs to ensure that the development pattern in those areas does not lead to <br />low-density suburban sprawl throughout the urban service area. Suburban sprawl is characterized <br />by low-density development consisting of disconnected, segregated uses. To achieve an efficient <br />and compact land use pattern with an overall low density character, the county's policy should be <br />to promote clustered development; walkable, connected neighborhoods; and mixed use projects. <br />➢ Development of Vacant Lots in Existing Subdivisions <br />During the 1996-2007 period, a significant amount of residential construction occurred on vacant <br />lots in existing, platted subdivisions. The three existing subdivisions with the highest number of <br />single-family residences constructed during this period were Vero Lake Estates (1,709 homes), <br />Vero Beach Highlands (466 homes), and Oslo Park (382 homes). <br />Consisting of approximately 5,000 lots in an area of approximately three square miles, Vero <br />Lake Estates is the largest subdivision in the unincorporated county. During the 1996-2007 <br />period, the number of residences in Vero Lake Estates nearly quadrupled, increasing from 634 in <br />1996 to 2,343 in 2007. <br />As of 2007, the unincorporated county area contained 10,098 vacant lots in existing, platted <br />subdivisions. Of those lots, nearly a quarter (2,376 lots) are in Vero Lake Estates. The remaining <br />vacant lots are dispersed in subdivisions, including both older and newer developments, <br />throughout the unincorporated county area. <br />While the long-delayed construction of the Vero Lake Estates subdivision is beneficial to the <br />county, the rapid pace of construction in that subdivision does create challenges. Such challenges <br />result from inadequate infrastructure within the subdivision (roads, water, and sewer) as well as <br />increased demands on county roads used to access Vero Lake Estates. Because of the challenges <br />resulting from construction of homes in older subdivisions with inadequate infrastructure, the <br />county will need to make infrastructure improvements in existing subdivisions such as Pine Tree <br />Park, Oslo Park, Vero Lake Estates, and others. In particular, unpaved roads need to be paved, <br />and water lines need to be constructed. Usually, these types of improvements are done through <br />assessment projects, where benefiting land owners pay their fair share of the improvement costs. <br />Aesthetics of Residential Development <br />Oftentimes, new residential developments are disconnected from adjacent neighborhoods and <br />have insufficient pedestrian networks. In addition, some new residential developments have <br />insufficient landscaping and monotonous architecture. <br />Future Land Use Element 91 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.