My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-252A (17)
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2010
>
2010-252A (17)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2022 3:14:37 PM
Creation date
10/5/2015 10:00:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
10/12/2010
Control Number
2010-252A (17)
Agenda Item Number
10.A.3
Entity Name
Comprehensive Plan
Subject
EAR based Amendments 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 2 Future Land Use Element
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
13449
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In the future, the county's policy should be to promote walkable, connected neighborhoods; to <br />promote the integration of residential and commercial uses via mixed use projects; and to address <br />aesthetic concerns regarding landscaping and residential architecture. Those areas of concern are <br />discussed below, with the exception of promoting mixed use projects which is discussed later <br />under "Commercial Development". Also discussed is one approach to resolving those issues, <br />traditional neighborhood design (TND). <br />➢ Connectivity <br />Connectivity refers to interconnecting streets among and between individual developments to <br />create an interconnected system of local roads. In residential areas, those interconnections can be <br />vehicular (interconnected streets or driveways) or pedestrian (sidewalks or trails). The resulting <br />system provides convenient pedestrian routes and alternatives to major roadways (arterials and <br />collectors) for some vehicle trips. Benefits of interconnected streets include reduced trips on <br />nearby major thoroughfares, reduced trip lengths for journeys between nearby developments, and <br />more efficient integration of land uses. <br />Prior to the 1960s, it was common in Indian River County, as well as many localities across the <br />nation, for residential subdivisions to be laid -out in a simple grid pattern of public streets. Local <br />examples include original town areas of Vero Beach and Fellsmere, Vero Lake Estates, Paradise <br />Park and Oslo Park. During that era, some modified public street grid layouts were approved <br />and developed. McAnsh Park in Vero Beach is an example of a modified grid. The grid systems <br />of those older subdivisions were extended to project boundaries and were picked -up and <br />extended when adjacent sites were developed. <br />In recent decades, typical subdivision layouts in the county, and throughout the nation, have <br />consisted of self-contained, curvilinear and cul-de-sac systems of private streets. Many of those <br />developments are gated communities with private streets. Those subdivisions have few <br />connections to the "outside" public street system and most often no connections to adjacent <br />residential developments. <br />Several factors limit the creation of interconnected roadway systems, including: <br />• Physical constraints such as canals, environmentally sensitive lands, FDOT outfall <br />ditches, existing development, and other factors that physically preclude connections. <br />• Opportunity constraints relating to "piece -meal" development of individual projects over <br />time vs. the opportunity to coordinate individual projects at the same time (e.g. South <br />County Initiative). <br />• Opportunity constraints relating to the "funneling effect", whereby there is only one <br />potential inter -connection that leads through a small existing neighborhood from a large <br />project. Such situations, where significant traffic from a large project would be funneled <br />through a street serving a few residences, should be avoided. <br />• Objections from existing residents potentially affected by proposed connections. Such <br />objections and concerns are widely reported in localities across the nation and stem from <br />Future Land Use Element 92 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.