2010-252A (20) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Comprehensive Plan Solid Waste Sub -Element landfill through the five CCCs. This is a significant drop from the more than thirty percent (30%) in 1998. Even with this reduced activity level, however, the County must coordinate and maintain the five CCCs at a cost of about $2 million per year, an amount that accounts for more than fifteen percent (15%) of the yearly SWDD operation costs. Another problem associated with the existing collection and transfer system is illegal dumping. This problem has two parts. One part is the improper disposal of solid waste along County roadways and on private property. The other part is improper use of the five CCCs. With the existing system, the service area for each transfer station is about 5 miles, and the CCCs are not open 7 days a week. This causes some inconvenience and results in illegal dumping. In response to illegal dumping problems, the County adopted Chapter 973, Public Nuisance, of the Indian River County Code of Laws and Ordinances. According to Chapter 973, an accumulation of debris, garbage, junk, trash, weeds, unserviceable vehicles, dead trees posing a health or safety hazard, or other noxious materials may be declared a public nuisance. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 973, the county may abate public nuisances if property owners fail to take action. The Environmental Planning and Code Enforcement Section of the Indian River County Planning Department administers this ordinance. Also, Chapter 204, Solid Waste Disposal, of the County code has specific sections regarding littering and use of CCCs and the landfill within the County. In the future, the County has three options for modifying the County's existing collection system. The County could: (i) keep the CCCs open seven days a week with longer operational hours; (ii) build more CCCs; or (iii) establish a countywide mandatory solid waste collection system. To have CCCs open seven days a week or build additional centers, the county would incur additional costs that, according to the SWDD, are not justifiable. For example, it would cost an additional $400,000.00 per year to operate another CCC that could be open 5 days a week. The SWDD estimates that it would cost another $300,000 per year to keep the existing CCCs open seven days a week. If a mandatory door-to-door solid waste collection system is initiated, the need for the CCCs would be greatly reduced. Overall, mandatory solid waste collection could eliminate the costs associated with maintaining the CCCs and reduce illegal dumping. With mandatory door-to-door solid waste collection, illegal dumping would decline because it would be more convenient for residents to have their solid waste removed by curbside collection than by illegally dumping solid waste. From a cost perspective, closing the CCCs could reduce SWDD operational expenses by $2,000,000 a year. Also, the CCC properties could be sold or used for other purposes. If all types of solid waste were collected at the place of generation and transferred directly to the landfill site, there would be less need for coordination, and the County would have better control of the solid waste stream entering the landfill site. Such a mandatory door-to-door solid waste collection system would provide for better control of the solid waste stream entering the landfill site. Consequently, the County's policy should be to evaluate the feasibility of establishing a mandatory collection system in the future. Processim/Disposal Community Development Department Indian River County 23