My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/13/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
7/13/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:18 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:14:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/13/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK FELT THE REQUIREMENTS SHOULD BE <br />MADE AS SPECIFIC AS POSSIBLE AND NOT LEFT DISCRETIONARY WHERE THEY <br />COULD BE APPEALED; MR. REVER, HOWEVER, FELT THERE SHOULD BE SOME <br />DISCRETION IN REGARD TO REQUIRING DIFFERENT AMOUNTS OF INFORMATION <br />FOR DIFFERENT SIZE PROJECTS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT ONE OF THE FUNCTIONS OF <br />THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS IS TO REVIEW ACTIONS BY A COUNTY EMPLOYEE <br />AND DECIDE WHETHER A DISCRETIONARY ACTION MIGHT GO BEYOND THE BOUNDS <br />OF THEIR AUTHORITY, AND FURTHER NOTED THAT A DECISION OF THE BOARD <br />OF ADJUSTMENT DOES NOT BIND THE COUNTY COMMISSION FROM ASKING FOR <br />EVERYTHING REQUIRED IN THE ORDINANCE. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE QUESTIONED THE REFERENCE ON PAGE It TO <br />IDENTIFYING THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PRONE AREAS, AND IT WAS CONFIRMED <br />THAT IT WOULD BE SUFFICIENT TO SIMPLY INDICATE WHETHER A PROJECT IS IN <br />THE AREA DESIGNATED ON THE FEDERAL MAP AS THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED THAT THE WORD "XEROX" WILL BE <br />ELIMINATED IN THE MIDDLE OF PAGE 11 AND IT WILL JUST STATE THAT THEY <br />WILL FORWARD ONE COPY OF THE COMMENTS. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE QUESTIONED THE TERM "QUALIFIED PROFES- <br />SIONALS" USED ON PAGE 5, AND MR. REVER EXPLAINED THAT THEY WOULD <br />ANTICIPATE A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR PLANNER WOULD BE THE ONE WHO <br />WOULD DO THIS TYPE OF EVALUATION RATHER THAN SOME OTHER TYPE OF <br />PROFESSIONAL. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS WISHED TO SEE SOME DISCUSSION AS TO ANY <br />EXISTING PROJECTS WHICH WOULD BE AFFECTED BY THIS ORDINANCE. HE <br />BELIEVED THERE WOULD BE SUBSTANTIAL HARDSHIP IF THIS WERE IMPOSED ON <br />THOSE WHO ARE ALREADY ALONG THE WAY IN THEIR PROCESSING. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS AGREED WE -SHOULD NOT CHANGE THE RULES IN THE <br />MIDDLE OF THE GAME. <br />CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON THE REQUIREMENTS RE- <br />LATING TO IDENTIFYING THE IMPACT ON SUCH THINGS AS POLICE PATROLS, <br />HOSPITAL BEDS, ANNUAL AD VALOREM TAX YIELD, ENDANGERED SPECIES, ETC, <br />AND HOW THIS CAN BE DETERMINED. THE PLANNING DIRECTOR COMMENTED THAT <br />THERE ARE NATIONAL STANDARDS AND FORMULAS WHICH CAN BE USED TO <br />DETERMINE THE IMPACT ON POLICE PROTECTION AND HOSPITAL BEDS, <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK DID NOT SEE THE NECESSITY FOR INCLUDING <br />ALL THESE VARIOUS ELEMENTS IN THE ORDINANCE WHEN THERE ALREADY ARE <br />JUL 131981 WPAGE,8 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.