Laserfiche WebLink
J U L 131981 foo PAY' 7 <br />STANDARDS TO DETERMINE THESE IMPACTS. HE FELT WE SHOULD CONCENTRATE <br />MORE ON ASSESSING THE IMMEDIATE IMPACTS ON THINGS SUCH AS ROADS, <br />WATER, FIRE PROTECTION; ETC; OTHERWISE, WE WILL SIMPLY BE AMASSING <br />A VOLUMINOUS DOCUMENT THAT WILL NOT BE USED, <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER DID NOT VISUALIZE THIS AS AN <br />EXCESSIVE DOCUMENT, BUT RATHER AS A VALUABLE DATA COLLECTION TOOL, <br />WHICH -IN THE LONG HAUL WOULD SUPPLY INFORMATION TO MANY AGENCIES WITH— <br />IN THE COUNTY. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT A DOCUMENT SIMILAR TO THAT <br />WHICH WOULD BE REQUIRED BY THIS ORDINANCE HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE <br />RIVER BEND PROJECT, WHICH IS ABOUT 672 UNITS, AND THE ESTIMATED COST <br />OF PREPARATION WAS APPROXIMATELY $6,000. MR. REVER FELT THIS DOCUMENT <br />WAS A GOOD REPRESENTATIVE DOCUMENT. <br />THE BOARD RECESSED BRIEFLY TO ALLOW COMMISSIONER BIRD TO <br />CONTACT THE SCHOOL BOARD AND RECONVENED AT 1:57 O'CLOCK P.M. WITH <br />THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT. <br />THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. <br />WILLIAM KOOLAGE OF 26TH AVENUE STATED THAT HE HAD A PROBLEM <br />WITH THE WORDING ON PAGE 10, SECTION 6, "THIS IS TO INSURE THAT AN <br />ANALYSIS BE MADE ON A PROPOSED PROJECT BEFORE THE PROJECT IS STARTED, <br />OR AT A STATE WHERE IT WOULD BE IIMPOSSIBLE I TO BE TERMINATED." IT <br />WAS AGREED THAT THE WORD "POSSIBLE" SHOULD BE SUBSTITUTED FOR <br />"IMPOSSIBLE". <br />MR. KOOLAGE NOTED THAT PAGE 21 SECTION D STATES THAT THIS <br />DOCUMENT IS "TO ENSURE THAT THE CITIZENS AND TAXPAYERS OF INDIAN <br />RIVER COUNTY WILL NOT HAVE TO BEAR THE COSTS RESULTING FROM HAPHAZARD <br />AND UNCOORDINATED MAJOR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES...". HE DID NOT SEE <br />ANYTHING TO ENSURE THAT THE TAXPAYER WILL BE PROTECTED FROM THESE <br />COSTS BECAUSE THE ORDINANCE HAS NO PROVISION FOR ENFORCEMENT AND <br />THERE IS NOTHING DEALING WITH IMPACT FEES. MR. KOOLAGE QUESTIONED <br />HOW THE COUNTY COULD REFUTE THE DEVELOPER'S ESTIMATE AS TO THE IMPACTS. <br />PETER ROBINSON OF LAUREL HOMES HAD SOME QUESTIONS FROM THE <br />DEVELOPER'S STANDPOINT. HE QUESTIONED THE REQUIRED LISTING OF THE <br />ENDANGERED SPECIES AND WISHED TO KNOW WHO IS RESPONSIBLE IF THE <br />DEVELOPER DID NOT DISCOVER ANY AND IT WAS LATER DETERMINED THERE ARE <br />SOME AT THAT LOCATION. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT AGENCIES SUCH AS THE GAME AND <br />FRESHWATER FISH COMMISSION AND THE WILDLIFE PEOPLE -PRETTY WELL KNOW <br />TFWMALS OR PLANT LIFE�ANDCOULD BE CALLED UPON BY„o <br />" % 4a <br />