My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/15/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
7/15/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:18 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:16:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/15/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J U L 151981 <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS INFORMED MRS. <br />BOOS ' <br />pq "E� <br />ROBINSON THAT HE HAD SEEN THE <br />REPORT AND HAD READ IT. HE EXPLAINED THAT HE HAD THOUGHT SHE WAS <br />TALKING TO ENGINEER DAVIS AND DID NOT REALIZE SHE WISHED TO BE HEARD. <br />ARGUMENT CONTINUED AS TO WHO HAD OR HAD NOT SEEN OR READ <br />THE REPORT AND AS TO THE NECESSITY OF ACTUALLY APPROVING IT AS OPPOSED <br />TO MERELY ACCEPTING IT. <br />WITH REGARD TO INDICATING A PREFERENCE FOR ONE STRUCTURE <br />RATHER -THAN ANOTHER, COMMISSIONER BIRD FELT WE WOULD HAVE TO OBTAIN <br />INFORMATION FROM OUR ENGINEER BEFORE MAKING SUCH A DECISION, AND HE <br />DID NOT FEEL THAT DECISION HAD TO BE MADE TODAY. <br />INTERESTED CITIZEN WILLIAM KOOLAGE SUGGESTED THAT POSSIBLY <br />THE BOARD SHOULD RECONSIDER THEIR ACTION. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER MADE A MOTION TO RECONSIDER THE BOARD'S <br />PREVIOUS ACTION, BUT IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT SUCH A MOTION CANNOT BE <br />MADE BY ONE WHO VOTED IN OPPOSITION TO THE BOARDS ACTION AND ALSO <br />THAT A 4/5 VOTE IS NECESSARY TO APPROVE RECONSIDERATION. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER BIRD, TO RECONSIDER THE BOARDS PREVIOUS ACTION APPROVING THE <br />_OGICAL REPORT. <br />FURTHER DISCUSSION WAS HELD IN REGARD TO THE NEED TO TAKE <br />ACTION TODAY-, AND COMMISSIONER FLETCHER WISHED TO KNOW WHAT ANOTHER <br />FEW WEEKS WOULD MATTER AFTER SO MANY YEARS. COMMISSIONER WODTKE <br />POINTED OUT THAT ANY DELAYS ARE NOW COSTING US 1% A MONTH OR ABOUT <br />$10,000412,000, <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE (QUESTION ON THE MOTION TO RE- <br />CONSIDER, AND IT WAS DEFEATED BY A 3-2 VOTE WITH COMMISSIONERS WODTKE <br />AND BIRD VOTING IN OPPOSITION; A 4/5 VOTE OF APPROVAL BEING NECESSARY. <br />MRS. ROBINSON STATED THAT, ALTHOUGH SHE HAD A LOT OF <br />ADMIRATION FOR COMMISSIONER WODTKE, HE WAS OUT OF THE ROOM WHEN THE <br />REPORT WAS READ, AND AS A CITIZEN, SHE OBJECTED TO HIS VOTING ON SOME- <br />THING WHEN HE HADNfT EVEN READ IT. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE REPLIED THAT, ALTHOUGH HE DID NOT READ <br />THE LETTER ITSELF, HE HAD TALKED TO ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ABOUT IT AND <br />HAD A GOOD IDEA OF IT. HE CONSIDERED IT SIMPLY PUTTING AN ADMINISTRA- <br />TIVE REPORT IN THE RECORD AND NOT CHOOSING ONE ALTERNATIVE OR THE <br />OTHER. HE NOTED THAT THE DER JUST WANTS US TO BE AWARE OF THEIR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.