Laserfiche WebLink
r aoUK �� <br />UG 5 1981 pact <br />WILLIAM KOOLAGE, INTERESTED CITIZEN, FELT THAT MOST OF THE <br />PUBLIC THOUGHT THAT THE VERY BASIC REASON FOR'HAVING INDIAN RIVER <br />BOULEVARD WAS THE RESPONSE TIME IN GETTING PEOPLE TO THE HOSPITAL. <br />NOW HE IS HEARING SOMETHING DIFFERENT AS TO HOW CRITICAL THE ROAD <br />IS, AND THOUGHT THIS MAY BE A REASON FOR ADDITIONAL PUBLIC INPUT. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE WITHDREW HIS MOTION AND COMMISSIONER <br />BIRD WITHDREW HIS SECOND. <br />ON MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COM- <br />MISSIONER FLETCHER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE COUNTY <br />ADMINISTRATOR AND THE CHAIRMAN TO MAKE THE APPROPRIATE CONTACTS WITH <br />THE CITY, AND REYNOLDS, SMITH AND HILLS, IN ORDER TO ARRANGE A JOINT <br />PUBLIC HEARING AS SOON AS POSSIBLE REGARDING THE INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD <br />PROJECT. <br />REVISED PETITION PAVING PROGRAM - ORDINANCE 8I-27 <br />THE HOUR OF 9:30 O'CLOCK A.M. HAVING PASSED, THE DEPUTY CLERK <br />READ THE FOLLOWING NOTICE WITH PROOF OF PUBLICATION ATTACHED, TO -WIT: <br />