My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/5/1981 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
8/5/1981 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:18 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:36:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/05/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUG 1 Bou 4 � u GF -7 <br />5 981 <br />THERE BEING ONLY TWO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC PRESENT, THE <br />BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONTINUED WITH OTHER COMMISSION BUSINESS, <br />WHICH IS REPORTED IN THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR AUGUST 5TH MEETING, <br />IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE PUBLIC ADDITIONAL TIME TO ARRIVE. <br />AT APPROXIMATELY 8:20 O'CLOCK P.M. THE CHAIRMAN ANNOUNCED <br />THAT THE BOARD WOULD COMMENCE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CREATING <br />THE GIFFORD AREA MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT AS ADVERTISED FOR <br />7:30 P.M., A GOODLY NUMBER OF MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC HAVING ARRIVED. <br />ATTORNEY HOULIHAN STATED THAT THE ADVERTISEMENT WAS IN ORDER. <br />THE HISTORY OF THE PUBLIC HEARING IS EXPLAINED IN EXERPT <br />FROM THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS MEMO OF JULY 8TH AS FOLLOWS: <br />The Administration has received verbal request from Mr. J. Blayne Jennings;, <br />on behalf of the Gifford community, requesting the Board to call for a public <br />hearing regarding the creation of a street lighting destrict for the Gifford <br />area. <br />Description and Conditions <br />The boundaries of the proposed district would be roughly 49th Street on <br />North, Kings Highway on the West, 40th Street and the Vero Beach City <br />limits on the South, and a line East of U.S. Highway # 1 to the East. <br />Mr. Jennings has received estimates on lighting requirements from Florida <br />Power and Light Company and the City of Vero Beach, each of which serves <br />a portion of the proposed district. The proposal from Florida Power & Light <br />calls for a total of one hundred and three lights at an estimated annual <br />cost of $5,617. The City of Vero Beach proposal calls for an additional <br />two hundred and eighty-nine lights at an annual cost of approximately $32,612. <br />The total three hundred and ninety-two lights proposed by the two electrical <br />systems would have an annual cost of approximately $38,229• <br />With estimated contingencies, appraisal and collection of fees, the Administration <br />estimates a gross budget requirement of $44,452. with a net tax levy of $42,229. <br />Based upon an estimated tax base within the district of $18,000,000., the <br />millage requirement would be 2.35 mills. It should be noted the $18,000,000. <br />tax base utilizes the $15,000. homestead exemption, and will change as the <br />$20,000. homestead exemption is implemented in 1981, and the $25,000. exemp- <br />tion is implemented in 1982. Additionally; final determination of the district <br />boundaries will affect the district tax base to some extent. <br />In the past, Indian River County „as.created street lighting districts <br />using the municipal service taxing unit vehicle. In that manner payment <br />for street lights is based upon a ad valorem tax levied against taxable <br />property within the unit. As an alternative to that approach, the Board <br />may wish to consider utilization of a front Toot assessment charge, on <br />an annual basis for street lighting, under the special assessment ordinance <br />which the Board will consider on August 5, 1981. <br />ATTORNEY J. BLAYNE JENNINGS EXPLAINED TO THOSE PRESENT <br />THAT BOTH FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT AND THE CITY OF VERO BEACH HAVE <br />FRANCHISES IN GIFFORD AND WOULD SERVE A PORTION OF THE PROPOSED <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.