My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/2/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
9/2/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:18 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:40:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/02/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK- 47 PmE361 <br />THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THEREUPON RECESSED AT <br />12:00 NOON FOR LUNCH AND RECONVENED AT 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE DID NOT RETURN FOR THE AFTERNOON PORTION OF <br />THE MEETING; ALL OTHER COMMISSIONERS WERE PRESENT. <br />CHANGE ORDERS 65 AND P66-- ADMINISTRATION BUILDING <br />CONSTRUCTION PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE PERCULES KONTOULAS <br />EXPLAINED THAT IT IS NECESSARY TO REMOVE AND RELOCATE THE FOUR <br />PUMPS LOCATED ON THE EAST WALL OF THE OLD BOILER ROOM TO CET <br />THE SYSTEM IN ORDER. THIS WAS AN OVERSIGHT. THE REPAIRS <br />TO THE UNDERGROUND PIPING HAVE BEEN COMPLETED BECAUSE THIS <br />WAS PART OF THEIR TESTING. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK (QUESTIONED THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN <br />CHANGE ORDERS #,'-65 AND #66 FIGURES SHOWING THE AMOUNT OF <br />NET CHANGE BY PREVIOUS CHANGE ORDERS, AND MR. KoMTOULAS <br />EXPLAINED THAT THERE WAS AN ERROR IN CHANGE ORDER 61, A <br />$1,300 CORRECTION, WHICH WAS PICKED UP ON CHANCE ORDEP #66. <br />IT CONCERNED A DELETION BY THE CONTRACTOR. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY- APPROVED CHANGE <br />ORDER #r65 - ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,570.6F, <br />WITH THE NORMAL STIPULATION THAT BY APPROVING THE CHANGE <br />ORDER THE COUNTY DOES NOT WAIVE ANY RIGHTS IT HAS TO CLAIM <br />DAMAGES AGAINST THE CONTRACTOR OR THE ARCHITECT BECAUSE OF <br />OMISSIONS OR OTHER REASONS THAT MAY ARISE. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.