9/2/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SEP 2 1991 Boa 47 PAcE367 A 25' STREET ON THE NORTH OF THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION, WHICH IN CONJUNCTION WITH A FUTURE 25' CONTRIBUTION FROM THE ADJACENT OWNER ON THE NORTH WOULD PROVIDE THE 50' RIGHT OF WAY . HE NOTED THAT THE PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY TO THE NORTH IS A SIMILAR STRIP, AND IF AND WHEN THAT IS DEVELOPED, THAT OWNER WOULD BE IN THE SAME POSITION AS THE DEVELOPER OF THE PROPOSED SALT AIRE COVE SUBDIVISION. QUESTION AROSE AS TO BEACH ACCESS AND AS TO WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY BETWEEN THE SUBDIVIDED PORTION AND THE BEACH. ATTORNEY RODDENBERRY STATED THAT THERE IS AN EASEMENT WHICH ADJOINS THE PROPOSED ROAD AND GOES OUT TO THE BEACH.. DISCUSSION CONTINUED REGARDING UTILITY EASEMENTS IN ADDITION TO THE RIGHT OF WAY, AND THE NECESSITY FOR A CUL DE SAC. MRS. SALLY HOOVER REPRESENTING SMUGGLER'S COVE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, REPORTED THAT THEY HAD BEEN ASSURED THAT THEY WOULD BE NOTIFIED OF THIS MEETING; THEY HAD NOT BEEN NOTIFIED AND IT WAS ONLY BY ACCIDENT SHE LEARNED THAT THIS MATTER WAS ON THE AGENDA TODAY. IT WAS NOTED THAT WE ARE FOLLOWING VARIANCE PROCEDURES, AND ATTORNEY CIANFRONE CONFIRMED THAT THE ORDINANCE DOES NOT REQUIRE NOTICE; ALTHOUGH, THERE GENERALLY IS SOME NOTICE. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER FLETCHER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO MOVE CONSIDERATION OF THE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE TO ANOTHER AGENDA AND NOTIFY THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. ENGINEER BEINDORF EXPLAINED THAT THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE HAD ORIGINALLY SENT THEM TO THE VARIANCE BOARD WITH THIS REQUEST, AND THE VARIANCE BOARD INDICATED THAT A VARIANCE OF THIS NATURE SHOULD BE DEALT WITH BY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. UNDER THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, THEY DID NOFITY THE PEOPLE; BUT UNDER THE PRESENT PROCEDURE, THE NOTICE WAS NOT REQUIRED. COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK WISHED IT MADE CLEAR THAT WE WILL USE NORMAL PRODEDURES OF NOTIFICATION ALTHOUGH NOT REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE.