Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD, TO APPROVE CONNECTION AND RESERVATION OF <br />122 TAPS FOR PINECREST SUBDIVISION AS DISCUSSED, BASED ON THE ADMIN- <br />ISTRATOR I S ASSURANCES THAT WE DO HAVE EXCESS CAPACITY AND HAVE <br />NOT DENIED ANYONE IN THE AREA WHO HAS REO UESTED SERVICE; <br />SUBJECT TO THE ASSOCIATED IMPACT FEES ALL BEING PAID IN ADVANCE <br />AND CONVEYANCE OF THE NECESSARY LINES. <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR AND UTILITY DIRECTOR REVIEWED IN DETAIL <br />THE PRIORITY SYSTEM EARLIER APPROVED BY THE BOARD FOR <br />GRANTING ALLOCATIONS AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY HAVE FOLLOWED <br />THESE PROCEDURES AND HAVE BEEN SIGNING AGREEMENTS AND GETTING <br />SOME DEVELOPMENTS ONTO THIS SYSTEM, INCLUDING FRANK ZORC'S nRANGE <br />TERRACE, AND THERE IS ALLOCATION LEFT OVER. THE ADMINISTRATOR <br />STATED THAT HE WOULD KEEP A RUNNING TOTAL OF THE ALLOCATION RESERVE. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER WISHED TO KNOW IF THE INTENT OF THE MOTION <br />ON THE FLOOR IS TO SERVICE ALL THREE PHASES OF THE SUBJECT <br />SUBDIVISION, AND HE WAS INFORMED THAT WAS THE INTENT. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON <br />AND CARRIED 3 TO 1 WITH COMMISSIONER FLETCHER VOTING IN <br />OPPOSITION AND COMMISSIONER PODTKE BEING ABSENT. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT <br />APPROVAL FOR PINECREST SUBDIVISION, UNIT 3, AND ADMINISTRATOR <br />NELSON STATE D. THAT ALL REVISIONS WERE MADE IN CONFORMANCE �-"ITH <br />THE REQUEST OF THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, AND THERE ARE NO <br />OBJECTIONS TO THIS PROJECT. <br />ON LOTION BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />FLETCHER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF <br />PINECREST SUBDIVISION, UNIT 3, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE <br />ADMINISTRATOR. <br />39 <br />47 PAqlu <br />