Laserfiche WebLink
scheme : Indian Mer hnu v= r , including dike removal as <br />mitigation for road 011, nn rte ,P"ad that the four recommendations <br />of the VVrjd a Came and Froili t•u�r "Ish Commission be made revisions <br />to the permit instrument.'' <br />>) Flo -id- Dw, _ar,ment of Env tronM nt.tl R=egulation, 15 toy 1931 <br />(excepts froo text of DER Permit Application Appraisal) <br />"...The proposed road will .•ross wetlands that have been impounded <br />for mosuuita control and la:gu : e . ioas that are filled wetlands <br />(including back dikes). The impaers to these areas will be offset <br />by fill removal and, therefore, racreating the tidal wetlands .. <br />the restoration of tidal at tion t ; the impounded sites. " <br />After endorsing the aforementioned recommendations of the Florida <br />Game and Fresh Water Fish (',mmjss.on, the field appraisal further <br />states that "...If a flap ysated culvert must be used then the flap <br />gate must be installed on Lne upstream end of the culvert. The <br />flap gate on the downsueam and serves only to drain the impoundment <br />and not to ..._:tore tidal a, ion." <br />These recommendations hive not ',, L"1.^.lKO in the project design. <br />5) Treasure Coast Regional Planning (Y"nail. 3 July 1980 <br />"Council's primary concou , as t" naintain the integrity of thr <br />wetlands wbic h the proposed road 111 transverse by taking whatever <br />me3suros -oco ssary (e .g. , r -al ign i n;' the road to a more westerly <br />location and improving fli_snins of the diked wetlands)." <br />I have attached copies of these Keuments to this statement. <br />Page 4.7 "Thew wetlands hovtt been previously disturbed by a <br />dike system used for salt marsh mosquito control. These dikes <br />have caused a toss of Kistorical ecological value by reducing <br />plant and animal diversity; an-_ Lave terminated the export of <br />detrital material to Indian <ivpr Estuary, tidal, and freshwater <br />flushing; action, and Yater quality and sediment stabilization." <br />This statement, though essenia.lt• correct, deni.gr:ate•_ thu wetland's <br />current habitat value and does not express the potential for proper <br />habitat manaSement_. In the f irst place, 12C plant species were recorded <br />on-site; and although only lb bird npaciP3 were observed, nearly 100 <br />species could probably be recordwa via gore extensive survey. <br />Secondly, t fou h wai: ear -borne Pu'_r iant export has been eliminated, <br />feeding, activi_tles of wading bira , and : iAratory waterfowl can provide <br />substantial nutrient -export from impounded wetlands. <br />With regarl for the porentia l of A wounded wetlands, I offer the <br />following quote from zorrespondeno e of tie Florida Game and Fresh Water <br />Fish Commission (19 May 1940, enclosed) <br />"...when such areas are imp )ended cril y during the mosquito breeding <br />season anti dewateied with tidal exchange via culverts during the <br />cooler months, they become highly productive units of the estuarine <br />ecosystem... With enlightened man gement, mosquito control impoundments <br />provides goad :mosquito contr:al, uotiand wildlife habitat, and seasonal <br />exchange of nutrients and biota w.tL He adjacent estuary..." <br />Page 4.8 "No ;Tants or animals listed as rare, endangered, or <br />thre;at.neu on either the Federal. or state lists were observed <br />in the project study area. ' <br />Appendix n of `he .epnu st.:ttrl;, however, that brown pelicans <br />and ,:oo& storks were chserveo na site. These species are <br />listed as threatened and undingered, respectively, by the <br />'lorida flame. and Fresh Wntcr ist Commission. Brown pelicans <br />are al A listed as tmaingerec hv the U.S. Fish and Wildlife_ <br />Service. Filo ondaneerod m.ir too tins been observed in the main <br />.SRV! , nd at ; nant ni • Iw - s 4 :ani inK bird, found on-site <br />are , isL _rd by Kit- WK ,. ecles of special concern. <br />SEP 1 : r47 wor 41011A, <br />� 11 J <br />