Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 141981 Box 47 Rrf 31 <br />1',ige 4.9 "The rroje-t mai ii,duc � development in the floodplain; <br />however, numerous c•ondition�,, i.ncludin­ existing physical land <br />chal:act eristic and adriinist_r, i ._ actives (permits) are not <br />favursb: i.• for developm.nt . <br />Providing positive drainag,, c; these impounded wetlands has <br />bear, :ino l ude.d at the lando, nrr' s requests and would directly <br />impact. the wetland character of i:he impoundments, theraby <br />•ritually assuring future prof-osals for their development, and <br />possibly reducing effectiveness of state and Federal environmental <br />permitti_n;; procedure;;. <br />Again, thank �,ou for your ai.ten�ic:n a.�d consideration of these comments. <br />5ii:cerely <br />01 <br />+P <br />ft:iymond Fernald <br />President <br />Pe] ican Island Audubon Society <br />. r . t7 H?'...' ' . NT OF CO:,VIE: <br />INE FISHERIES SERVICE <br />'gut*aJ_ E,ui1t:� ng <br />9450 Yo,car Fkoulevard <br />Ste Nater burg, EL 33702 <br />July 16, .1.980 F/SFR61jDEN <br />e93-3503 <br />— „ .Teck G. Jennings, County ltd .irt�.stra 4;,r <br />I r::1L Fin River County <br />County Courthouse <br />V-_ -c., U(ach,, FL 329601 <br />Jennings: <br />;:s requested by letter dates June 1'0, 1980, from <br />Ar. _urn Wilson, Project Manager, Environn- _,ntal Science and <br />r n .!ring, Inc., the National Marine. Fisheries Service has <br />the proposed Indian River Boulevard Extension (ESE <br />3C-704-700). <br />1'.a3ed on our contractor's report, telephone conversation <br />wi t•.rb Wilson on June 16, 1980, enc: previous investigations <br />1.-1239; Indian River Co., September 21, 1978), we have con- <br />--1,A that the project Mould adversely impact mangrove wetlands. <br />since the least darroa ins alternative alignment has been <br />s_ lt_ c.!d the previously proposed L�cx culvert has been deleted in <br />-Fixed span bridge, and that previously pro_ <br />mitigation (re--aFtablishing tidal ::lurhinca to ir-.-)ounded <br />remains as part oaf the project, we would not object to <br />7.'_" ycu have nny guetionn, pleas `ont:,ct our Panama City <br />of _!cc. <br />sine( _ -1-1, !1.t,t. <br />•t• <br />Reg lo. -.U, i.'. , c} ' t.-*. r <br />- M. M <br />