My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/16/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
9/16/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:19 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:44:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/16/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 47 PAGE 48 9 <br />ENGINEER DAVIS REVIEWED BID #97 - TYPE II ASPHALT CONCRETE <br />AND REPORTED THAT DICKERSON WAS THE LOW BIDDER AND THE PRICE PER TON <br />IN PLACE THIS YEAR IS ALMOST NO INCREASE OVER LAST YEAR S PRICE. <br />HE NOTED THAT THERE -IS A CLAUSE BUILT IN THE CONTRACT THAT ANY IN- <br />FLATION OF OIL COSTS WILL BE BUILT INTO THE CONTRACT. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE BID OF DICKERSON, AS PER THE <br />FOLLOWING MEMO, AS BEING THE LOWEST AND BEST BID ON THE ANNUAL TYPE II <br />ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTRACT, TO BE PAID FROM ACCOUNT #004-214-541-35-39. <br />Bid #97 -fie II Asphalt Concrete <br />6 Bid Proposals sent out, 3 received <br />Dickerson Pan American Ft. Pierce Contracting <br />1. Type II Asphalt Concrete <br />Surface Coarse Material in <br />various quantities and at <br />various times as needed 26.75 per ton NB 28.50 per ton <br />2. Hauling and spreading <br />by an approved mechanical <br />spreader, and furnishing <br />Type II Asphalt Concrete <br />Surface Coarse Material 38.00 per tor. 85.00 Per ton 40.10 per ton <br />The Committee recommends IP.0 Bid #97 be awarded to the low bidder, Dickerson, Inc. <br />Fund Account 1`004-214-541-35-39 <br />DISCUSSION ENSUED ON BID #98 FOR ELEVATOR SERVICE <br />MAINTENANCE. CONCERN WAS EXPRESSED ABOUT THE HIGH COST OF THIS <br />SERVICE, AND ADMINISTRATOR NELSON POINTED OUT THAT WE MUST HAVE <br />THIS SERVICE IN ORDER TO RECEIVE OUR CERTIFICATION, AND OUR MAIN- <br />TENANCE PEOPLE CANNOT DO THIS. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SCURLOCK, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE BID OF MIAMI ELEVATOR <br />AS PER THE FOLLOWING MEMO, AS BEING THE LOWEST AND BEST BID ON THE <br />ANNUAL ELEVATOR SERVICE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT, TO BE PAID FROM THE <br />ACCOUNTS AS SET OUT IN SAID MEMO. <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.