My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/16/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
9/16/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:19 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:44:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/16/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE TO APPROVE THE FOUR RECOMMENDATIONS LISTED IN <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR'S MEMO OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1981. <br />DISCUSSION AROSE ABOUT ENGINEERING COSTS WHICH WERE NOT <br />INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSED FUNDING OF $10,000, AND ADMINISTRATOR NELSON <br />REPORTED THAT THE CONTRACT WE HAVE WITH POST, BUCKLEY, SCHUH & JERNIGAN <br />AND BEINDORF & ASSOCIATES HAS NOT BEEN CHANGED SINCE THE ORIGINAL STAGES <br />OF THE LANDFILL OPERATION IN 1976, <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED THAT WE NEED <br />ANNUAL OR SEMI-ANNUAL REVIEW OF ALL CONTRACTS, AS TO SPECIFIC ENGINEER- <br />ING COSTS ON THIS MATTER, ENGINEER VOTAPKA STATED THAT HE WOULD HAVE TO <br />RESEARCH THEIR RECORDS AND REPORT BACK. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE WISHED TO INCLUDE IN THE MOTION THAT <br />ALL COSTS THAT ARE INVOLVED ARE COSTS THAT WERE INCURRED AND CHARGED <br />TO THE LANDFILL ACCOUNT, COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK HAD NO OBJECTION, <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, <br />PERMIT BETWEEN INDIAN RIVER FARMS WATER CONTROL DISTRICT <br />AND THE COUNTY IS HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES, <br />51 <br />BOOK 47 PAGE 518 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.