Laserfiche WebLink
should be used for any other purpose. In addition, the Town <br />would be glad to sign an agreement to that same effect. Mr. <br />MacAdam noted that the Town obviously is concerned about the <br />development of a park on this particular property which sits <br />in a very fine residential area and requires a special kind <br />of treatment both as to design and policing. Only by the <br />Town and the County working jointly can this be accomplished. <br />He continued that tomorrow is the postponed second reading of <br />the ordinance to proceed with the annexation, and the Town <br />feels it has to make a move because they are running out of <br />time. They would appreciate the County going along with the <br />process to annex the entire parcel for the reasons stated. <br />Chairman Lyons commented that he received the impression <br />at the workshop meeting, that the County Commission does <br />believe the present Council of Indian River Shores, but is <br />worried about future Councils. <br />Considerable discussion ensued as to the law enforcement <br />problem and the possible closing of the park at an earlier <br />hour. Sheriff Dobeck reviewed the proposed layout of the <br />park in regard to accessibility for patrol vehicles and felt <br />that once the park is developed, they will have no problem in <br />patrolling. He reported that none of the complaints received <br />relate to violence,'but are mostly in regard to vehicles in <br />the area when the park is closed. The Sheriff stated his men <br />would close the park as close to dusk as possible. <br />The possibility of a cooperative effort between the <br />Indian River Shores Police Department and the Sheriff was <br />brought up, and Chairman Lyons noted that originally the <br />Indian River Shores police did close the gate for us, but <br />then they asked to be relieved of the duty. <br />Mr. MacAdam explained that he and Mayor Nolan take the <br />position that that is County property and were a problem to <br />occur because of the closing of the gate, the Town could be <br />held liable for the problem. <br />® CT L- 21.1981 61 BOOK 47 PAGE 81.-14 <br />