Laserfiche WebLink
Attorney Larry Barkett came before the Board <br />representing the Chamber of Commerce and reported that the <br />proposed ordinance was drafted by him and submitted to the <br />Administrator's staff for review and revision. <br />Considerable discussion followed, and it was generally <br />agreed that an ordinance of this type is very much needed, <br />but the Board had problems with restricting transients to <br />operate only at licensed flea markets and, in addition, <br />restricting flea markets to operate only in M-1 and <br />Agricultural zones. Question also arose as to the $150 <br />yearly license fee for conducting business as a flea market <br />operator and a $15 zoning permit fee for each booth. <br />Commissioner Fletcher did not feel that individuals who <br />grow produce should be limited -to selling it only on their <br />own property, but Attorney Collins -did not feel the wording <br />of the proposed ordinance prevented individual stands. <br />Further discussion was held in regard to setting up <br />transient merchants in a specific location, and argument <br />ensued as to definitions and whether the ordinance actually <br />says what we intend. <br />Commissioner Fletcher emphasized that he did not want <br />to stifle competition, and it was his belief that the local <br />merchants do not want to compete. <br />Attorney Barkett and Vice Chairman Wodtke disagreed, <br />and pointed out that the objection is that it is unfair <br />competition to the local merchants since everyone should be <br />required to obtain a license. <br />Commissioner Fletcher was of the opinion that no one <br />should have to have a license. <br />It was emphasized that the intent is not to eliminate <br />these merchants, but just control them. <br />William Koolage, speaking as an interested citizen, saw <br />the need for protection of the public, but believed the <br />proposed ordinance is getting away from that main intent. <br />NOV 181981 <br />43 <br />BOOK 48 PACE 174 <br />