My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/25/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
11/25/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:20 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:44:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/25/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
he has received an indication that they will cooperate, but <br />he still wished to know what to do about Eckerd's and 7-11 <br />stores. <br />Further discussion ensued re the value of the donated <br />plant, the status of Eckerd's and 7-11 stores, the F.I.T. <br />property, etc., and Attorney Collins felt the Board should <br />consider that when the Pebble Bay plant and the property on <br />which it is located were bought, the property was bought at <br />substantially less than the market value because of the <br />sewer plant being located upon it, and it was anticipated <br />there would be expenses associated with removal of the plant <br />at some time. He believed that the property was worth at <br />least.$100,000 more than we paid for it. <br />Lengthy discussion continued re the impact fee, and the <br />possibility of raising it to $800. Mr. Latta strongly <br />objected to any raising of the impact fee. <br />Chairman Lyons noted that removing this plant will <br />result in a park for the use of the whole county. He felt <br />the $700 figure makes sense and is one that can be sold to <br />Indian River Shores for collection. In addition, he pointed <br />out that we can help the situation by adding the various <br />parcels discussed. The Chairman pointed out that we are not <br />able to run the sewer plant at a reasonable cost because of <br />the problems we inherited, and he believed it is worth the <br />money, if we can get rid of this plant. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by <br />Commissioner Scurlock, to set a value on the used plant of <br />$40,000; include the additional commercial property and <br />F.I.T. property in the assessment roll; and reach an <br />agreement with the Town of Indian River Shores about <br />collection of the impact fees on any annexed property. <br />The Board continued to review the figures involved, and <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt 267 taps would result in an <br />impact fee of approximately $815. Alternatives for trying <br />to reduce this amount were suggested, and it was noted that <br />N O V 25 1991 9 gooK P1. �� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.