My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/30/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
11/30/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:20 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:44:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/30/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NOV 3 01981 <br />PAY216 <br />sewage. <br />We had to make a major modification to the lift <br />station, however, to be able to service Harbour Island. <br />The Chairman asked if the Commission would go along <br />with the suggested approach, and Commissioner Scurlock <br />stated that he mainly was interested in seeing that there <br />was not some large subsidization of this program by ad <br />valorem taxes. He felt this is a reasonable approach with <br />possibly a few modification re the number of taps designated <br />for the County park and F.I.T. <br />The source of funding was brought up, and <br />Intergovernmental Coordinator Thomas stated that we had a <br />surplus -with FmHA of close to $70,000 from the Gifford <br />project; these funds are already set aside and we do not <br />have to reapply for them. <br />Commissioner Fletcher questioned a cost of $15,000 to <br />disconnect and move the plant in Pebble Bay since the price <br />quoted for moving the lift station, which is only 1/10 the <br />size of the plant, was quoted at $5,000. It was explained <br />that treatment plants are modular and set up to be moved. <br />Commissioner Bird stated that he agreed with the <br />approach presented by the Chairman, but asked whether we <br />have any provision for some kind of rebate to those being <br />assessed in the event we do not spend as much as budgeted. <br />Chairman Lyons -felt unless there is a big disparity, <br />the money should accrue to the General Fund because of the <br />money spent on this system over the years. <br />Question arose on an allowance of only two units for <br />the park area and one unit for F.I.T. Commissioner <br />Scurlock felt there should be an allowance of four units for <br />the park area. Engineer Robbins reported that, based on 110 <br />parking places multiplied by 12 gallons per parking place <br />per day, they came up with a figure of 3.77 or approximately <br />4. In regard to F.I.T., they had figured on two units since <br />one person will be living there. It was noted that there <br />61 <br />- ® M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.