11/30/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

will be three buildings, and F.I.T. should be set up for three units. Fritz Gierhart, Vice Mayor of the Town of Indian River Shores, commented that in two weeks time, some of the parcels the County is planning on assessing will be in Indian River Shores. He stated that the Town would like to be of help in smoothing this transition problem out, and what they would like to do is collect the fees on the east side of S.R. AlA. Mr. Geirhart continued that Indian River Shores wishes to pay their pro rata share of the County's bid price,,but does not feel they should have to participate in the costs associated with such things as interest, contingency, and legal lees, which actually are not a part of the sewer hook-up fee, but just the price of doing business. He reported that the Town felt that including Sea Watch and Le Mer in the County assessment roll is a discrepancy since Indian River Shores paid their cost, and, therefore, they question the number of units on the east side of the road. Discussion continued as to where the impact from the units counted for Sea Watch and Le Mer should be assessed since it appears they actually are on both assessment rolls. Engineer John Robbins stated that Sea Watch has a tie- in both to the Town and the County while Le Mer is totally under the Town; the contract the County has for $114,000 will provide sewer service to 7-11, Eckerd's, Pebble Bay - Villas and Sea Watch on the east side of the road. Although Sea Watch is on Indian River Shore's gravity line, it ultimately will be served by the County's lift station. Mr. Gierhart felt that if we stick to the bid contract, it does not make any difference how this is split up. One unit will pay a set amount,and if the County wants to add on carrying charges for the west side of the road, that is immaterial to Indian River Shores. They are willing to pay their pro rata share of the big contract; all they are 6 BOOK 4 PArF4.1 E NOV 301981