My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/30/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
11/30/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:20 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:44:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/30/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NOV 3 01991 BOOK pAu d$ <br />objecting to is inclusion of the legal fees, contingency and <br />the interest during construction. <br />John Curtin of Indian River Shores explained that the <br />Town is absorbing their risk for those specific cost <br />elements even though their cost is 2z times as high as the <br />County's. Their financing set up provides for adding 10% <br />for every deferred payment every calendar year. <br />Commissioner Scurlock noted that the Town will have new <br />customers to make up the difference and the County won't. <br />He then questioned the figure of $25,000 for interest during <br />construction, which he felt was excessive. <br />Mr_ Curtin felt that it would be necessary to borrow <br />for only three months.or so, and that a figure of $3,000 or <br />$4,000 should be sufficient. <br />Intergovernmental Coordinator Thomas noted that he was <br />given a cost of $207,000 and a time period of one year, and <br />if the figures have changed on total cost and total length <br />of time, he would have to refigure. <br />In regard to the $10,000 figure for contingency, <br />Engineer John Robbins reported that they took into account <br />that the contract might not be awarded until December 1st, <br />which would increase the price about $5,400, and in <br />addition, there are some buried utilities on which we do not <br />have any records. <br />Mr. Geirhart asked if the legal fees could be recovered <br />from delinquent payers, and it was felt that the legal fees <br />could be deleted since the County now is going to have a <br />full time county attorney. <br />Fred Scowden, local builder and resident of Pebble Bay, <br />disputed the number of hookups estimated by the County, <br />stating that Pebble Bay has 50 lots, not 45, and Vera Cruz <br />has 57 units, if you count the clubhouse, and not 35 as set <br />out in the County's figures. He further noted that a lot of <br />people.in Pebble Bay have already paid a $200 hook up fee. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.