My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/20/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
1/20/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:37 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:52:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/20/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
At a meeting held January 8, 19S2, Air. Corrigan, Mr. Bradley and the <br />County Administrator mutually agreed that since the forementioned respective <br />parties own 4000 acres, 4000 acres, and 2000 acres, the Corrigans and Ro-Ed <br />Corporation should each share 40% of the cost ($5,476. each) and the County should <br />share 200 of the cost ($2,738.). The County's benefit i�muld include unimproved <br />drainage for the Vero Lake Estates Subdivision and protection from erosion along <br />CR 510. <br />RECTI%E-NDATIONS AND FUNDING <br />Based upon the above meetings it is recormncnded that the County proceed to <br />stkzre in the $2,738. cost for clearing Canal "D". Funding to be fro.0 accoLLnt <br />n004-214-541-35.39 Road and Brid^e Aiaterials;Account, (unencumbered balance <br />11-31-81 is $5,16,779.) <br />Administrator Nelson commented that this was a <br />good effort to correct a problem that could be serious; he <br />felt the County's share of $2,738 for clearing Canal D was <br />appropriate. <br />Engineer Jim Davis explained the easements and the <br />drainage situation of the canal. <br />Commissioner Wodtke wondered why the owners of the <br />canal would not maintain it and if they were not going to <br />maintain it, then the County needs to obtain title. <br />Engineer Davis stated that this has been a problem <br />a number of years. <br />Commissioner Fletcher asked if this canal was <br />owned by the Drainage District but did not drain the <br />Drainage District land. <br />Engineer Davis responded affirmatively. <br />Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the location <br />of the canal and the boundaries; Commissioner Lyons <br />suggested that this item be tabled in order for the Attorney <br />to study this matter. <br />On Motion made by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by <br />Commissioner Lyons, the Board unanimously agreed to table <br />this item until it could be researched, and that it be <br />brought back before the Board and that a representative from <br />the Sebastian River Drainage District be present at the time. <br />15 <br />JAN 2 0 198 , �Qox 46 PAGE 568 <br />L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.