My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/27/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
1/27/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:37 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:54:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/27/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
his department to give their presentation_, they were willing to do so. <br />In answering all the questions, Mr. Rever stated they would have to deal <br />with .all the issues before them. <br />Mr. Challacombe then addressed the Board and said they had <br />requested the package, especially with the environmental information re- <br />lated to this site plan. He stated they were forwarded a letter explain- <br />ing, quote, "What they will do," in terms of addressing this at a later <br />date. The letter was forwarded to the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish <br />Commission for their analysis and opinion about the proposals that Florida <br />Land wished to establish concerning environmental issues.and asked to <br />read their letter into the minutes. The letter is attached to these <br />minutes. <br />Mr. Challacombe wished to point out they had requested <br />specific environmental information of this nature, of Florida Land,and , <br />had not been given that type of information. He went on to say, the <br />only information they had received was in the packets the Board had been <br />given and his department did not feel this was sufficient information <br />as such, to provide answers to the c6mments and recommendations of their <br />first recommendation the Board had received from his department, concern- <br />ing the environmental impact. <br />The Chairman requested Mr. Challacombe to specifically <br />state what information they would like to receive from Florida Land that <br />had not been received. <br />Mr. Challacombe said he would have to go back to the original <br />recommendation that had been postponed. After a brief delay to obtain <br />the original recommendation from his file, Mr. Challacombe stated their <br />original questions were: There had been no definitive answers to the <br />issues made by the Director of Public Works at the Technical Review Com- <br />mittee meeting held on October 261 1981. Item A. How would the east <br />side of Indian,River be stabilized? Florida Land did answer that question <br />to our satisfaction. Item B. 'The analysis by an independent firm to <br />determinethe effect of flooding in the proposed basin will have on water <br />resources within the area. Mr. Challacombe stated they had not received <br />a response to that question. Item C. Can flushing circulation be pro- <br />vided to prevent stagnation conditions? They had not yet received an <br />answer to that question.that was satisfactory to the Planning Department. <br />Mr. Challacombe then listed the environmental concerns, <br />The Department <br />of Environmental Regulation had <br />designated <br />the <br />Indian River <br />JAN 27 198, <br />_19- <br />Em <br />48 <br />FAGE �?�99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.