Laserfiche WebLink
IF - <br />FEB 2'982 <br />aml 48 mv 799 <br />7. I'c;11o:Jinc� is a list of Florida governmental agen- <br />cies for which Waste I•Iailage�ment, Inc. of Florida directly, or <br />i�'.I GUei Gni Of its Sll.iSidiaries or Operating tIivlSiQnS, haS <br />provided service in the past cold for which service is nOt <br />pl-esently being provided. Waste Management has never had a <br />contract cancelled for poor service or anv other reason. The <br />reason in each case wliv we are no longer servicing ti,2 <br />.munity is that On the- latest COlii tit rii r h con, - <br />tract, <br />bidding O � the CO <br />tract, we were not the low bidder. r <br />City of Hillsborough Beach <br />City of Ft. Lauderdale <br />City of La;:-_ Clark Shores <br />City of royal Palm Be-ach <br />City of Altamonte Springs <br />8. The "queStions and concerns" raised by "members of <br />the public" constitute nothing more than a rambling diatribe <br />by one person, John. Jennings, a forrmier competitor, who has <br />en?.aged i27 a mal iC.lOils Calllpc i gn against Waste Management, <br />Inc. of Florida for a couple of years. Dianv of his comments <br />are in_comurehensible so- <br />e will respolld only to the coherent <br />allegations. <br />To begin with, Mr. JeInings in his teStimC2 refte-red to <br />a nation l.Jide anti -racketeering probe by the F..BI rec,Ir;ling <br />Wast.e I'lanagel.ient, Ii:c. No one in the company is 'aware of <br />any such investigation. <br />P,Ir. Jennings said that the County Should "take a look <br />at some of the Grand Jury investigations." ta'hile there have <br />been none involving Waste Manacement, Inc. of Florida or <br />Waste :Management, Inc., there have been two such investic_ra- <br />tiors involving subsidiaries of ;taste Management, Inc. In <br />1973 a State Grand Jury in Wisconsin charged an operating <br />divisic-n of Waste Manage,:ent of Wisconsin, Inc. with collu- <br />sive -agreements witin two competitors. Tile Operating Manager <br />S,,,as acquitted, but tfle Wisconsin company was convicted and. <br />-"ine,d Y , 000 . ;he other s_tuat- on involved Georgia .'taste <br />System.s,+ Inc. a Waste I4an.agement, Inc. subsidiary doi.nq busi- <br />ness in rticinta, Georgic;. In 1930, a Federal Grand Jury <br />Charae� the Co mpany and tilree OtI'_�'r COmpani S in Fi` lcnta <br />Wit?7 Co�.1U:�i`�'e praCti Ces . Tilt' atter Iicl' nOt yet C,OIle to <br />tI"_al a.-Ld al! Cie "endantS v1gOrOUS �r assert the_r 12ii10 eI1Ce . <br />Tnlese are the only two such proceed -Ings in a tell year period <br />out of approximately 150 operating entitles. <br />Ne;:t, IMr. . Jennings had much Lto say about one contract." 1.n <br />Orlando, Flo_-ida - the Navy Buse � 'Til:_ only rel�tiVG in LE - <br />mation regarding that matter is t at Dump 111 a si'b'si'.i... ia <br />r y <br />of Waste 1'1anageil;ent, Inc. of Florida, was low h4 inter on tie <br />co ntra : t -or 2 number 'of years until the Contract was sub - <br />d for which Dulmo All did <br />,]ected :.G a Small Business set-aside <br />not qU 1-fy. The SL1ccesSful bidder on the next: CGnl'ract vas <br />OUa lity Corrugated Feed Products, which subcontracted a T33r- <br />tion of the con -tract to Dump I':ll with the full -edge <br />of the 1NTavv Base. CCnt::GversV arose because of the su^con- <br />tractinc, and friendly relationship between the General <br />Manager of Dump All and the President of quality and quality <br />did not- bi ' the next time the contract was placed o LO_' <br />bid. At this time the low bid,",.---- was Ronkoma, whLc: is Awned <br />bpi a b1^;i:h 'r -i 1 ` of ice O Waste <br />\ n- dJ G� an i ?" f tL I'ic I?c C�cei.^.i';�C, Inc. <br />Neither Waste DI-anagement, Inc. nor any suhsldia-r, has. an`r <br />owners1hin interest In RC? oaa, but because <br />of the relation- <br />S?iip by IIi trr iage, IRon'ko::l,. was d1i.squalifie d. The ma.t 'ar has <br />bee•il %OT'1Ctten by e%o "yc)ne illt c <br />�I 2 I1inC, I t iS 11:ci: <br />about not.?i.na <br />12? faCt, ' :`_ Tiit.ilt'rF'^lE.n+'. O=. JU:'iv A11 insists <br />�erninc� cailec: attirlL. :c- �� ? <br />� was p i.: the <br />Bu <br />r� <br />SI:1::11 �'u:il:ls s s,!!t-cl�i,�t� Cc: `TL �•l Galli f v tine ti1G he v: <br />34 <br />I <br />