Laserfiche WebLink
big? the ccntract anC: allG-.. "L-h—e : <br />I <br />to do all the `r:or�: in ex -- <br />change for <br />which lie �7GLil;7 ger a <br />fivi' r ' `cc??t ��ree" <br />L% :i i1 <br />All re''::se d <br />to pl rticin t -a in such <br />r _ <br />a sc`:.ex,e, fee a- <br />ling i � <br />„. d <br />.:L <br />�e i-mnroper. Althouc h :":r. Jennings denies tha I;Z.:re <br />Y_G <br />st ch <br />an o.fer, <br />Dump A11 ins_sts that <br />it was rade and , ill <br />., t� <br />ac <br />1.= ' t_, <br />since <br />that time-, 1-11r. Je--nn;ings ll s --ng, i n <br />a G"". a Cdipd.7- <br />l.o� rn-._.�..g Du, <br />�V Waste <br />p All and o 1 ,er 1��:lri i. e <br />Managel:ien L� corr:-o a <br />LL <br />ppearance <br />before this Co: L-nissio n <br />_es . <br />is in furthe ance O_ <br />t^a <br />c�:.'::oa' an . <br />'WasteI'�anagemr <br />ent and its subsldiales have grow.-. - <br />cessf.ully over the last tell years bty providing e cellentSand <br />innovative service a% CGnlpetltivei 5 <br />pr ce. Mr. Jennings seems <br />to "co;r;pete" by trying to attack his compet 4tion verball <br />:1e has hur _ed accusation tatter accusat ion: cit Waste Manage- <br />crit, Inc. of Florida yet nothing has conte of all of that <br />i� � ec--i ve . If one-t.::n -h of , what Mr. Jennings has sai c.' is <br />tiue, them Idaste Management would be Out of business. Or: thea <br />conL1.-a _ , Waste Management, Inc. of Florida has a well de <br />served, respected repu'cation throughout Florida, as can be <br />seem b- the other nLaterials submitted to tlZc Co i i <br />:gin ss o.,, and <br />Waste I•^:anagement, Inc. is the recognized industry leader both <br />I�a�io wily <br />and internationally. <br />ie trust that this ln-forriiatlon answers the Qlnest ^ , <br />prcposed to us. In addition, the individuals menti ones ` r� <br />will be present on the 210th to answer any other oues t .ons Vol;; <br />Mar hare. Than" you for your consideration. <br />Very truly= yours, <br />i <br />W. ✓lGond Bobo sky <br />Associate General Counsel <br />Attorney Bergerson responded affirmatively. <br />Commissioner Wodtke then talked about the letter <br />and the lack of information.it contained. He inquired about <br />Item 4 in Attorney Brandenburg's letter regarding achieving <br />a reasonable rate of return. <br />Attorney Bergerson advised that they were going to <br />be purchasing new equipment and that the shorter the <br />franchise period, the shorter the period of time they would <br />have to write it off. <br />Commissioner Wodtke commented that in Item 5, <br />regarding Grand Jury investigations, they did not answer the <br />question or give any names. <br />Attorney Bergerson stated that he had been with <br />the company for almost nine years; they did not try to take <br />a poll of every employee to see if they had ever been before <br />the Grand Jury. <br />F74 �! 0 � 0 . <br />35 <br />48 Fa, 8�® <br />