My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/3/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
3/3/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:01:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/03/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to allow these people to hook up. He noted that most of the <br />people concerned are in the Gifford area, with just a few <br />being from the South County area. <br />Commissioner Bird inquired about collection. problems, <br />and Mr. Liner reported that out of the 37, only six, who are <br />presently unemployed, are behind on payments on contract <br />fees; they have been paying their 'service bills, but are <br />behind in contract fees. Mr. Liner continued that these <br />people were offered a choice of 18 or 24 months to pay; and <br />there is no interest, but there is a loo handling charge <br />because these payments are handled on a manual basis. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked what time period Mr. Liner <br />would suggest for reopening the easy payment plan, and Mr. <br />Liner felt a two month period would be sufficient. He noted <br />that if his staff gets to a point where they have more than <br />sixty people on this arrangement, it will become a paperwork <br />nightmare. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by <br />Commissioner Lyons, to accept the recommendation of Utility <br />Director Liner and start a sixty-day period effective today <br />for the program of deferred payments for water and sewer <br />hook-up with the same guidelines as previously used. <br />Commissioner Fletcher 'stated that he planned to vote <br />against the Motion because he doubted the Board would be <br />willing to allow deferred payments on ad valorem taxes, and <br />it was noted that the Board does not have that authority. <br />The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on <br />and carried 4 to 1 with Commissioner Fletcher voting in <br />opposition. <br />APPLICATION BY GENERAL DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES FOR INDUSTRIAL <br />DEVELOPMENT BONDS <br />The Board reviewed the following memo from Attorney <br />Brandenburg: <br />41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.