My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/10/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
3/10/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:02:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/10/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAR 101982 WK 9 pat ill 1 <br />VERO BEACH - INDIAN RIVER COUNTY <br />BOARD OF REALTORS° <br />Post Office Drawer G <br />2182 Ponce De Leon Circle <br />R E A LTO RO Vero Beach, Florida 32960 <br />Phone (305) 567-3510 <br />re "Undeveloped Coastal Barriers" Maps <br />Public Hearing, March 10, 1982 <br />March 9, 1982 <br />Mr. Don C. Scurlock, Jr. 4 ; <br />Chairman <br />Board of County Commissioners <br />Indian River County <br />Vero Beach, Florida <br />V <br />Dear Mr. Scurlock: `V- j' <br />Wednesday morning you will be hearing comments fr(i&t'he public <br />regarding the U.S. Department of Interior's definition of "undeveloped <br />coastal barriers" and "flood -prone" lands in our county. The Vero <br />Beach -Indian River County Board.of Realtors is greatly concerned with <br />the designation of such areas and the subsequent effect that the des- <br />ignation will have on the availability of Federal Flood Insurance as <br />of October 1, 1983. <br />In question are criteria used by the Department of Interior in <br />drawing up its maps of Indian River County. Our research indicates <br />1. use of outdated maps of the county which do not <br />correctly reflect the current development of <br />coastal barrier regions (residential, grove or <br />other) ; and - <br />2. inclusion of areas which are historically.considered <br />non "flood -prone," specifically North county citrus - <br />groves, the Orchid township, portions of John's <br />Island and various individually owned parcels. <br />Therefore, we are of the opinion that the methodology by which <br />the Department of Interimr determined "flood -prone" and "undeveloped <br />coastal bariier" regions is not uniform....is not accurate in reflect- <br />ing the development of these areas .... and is not complete in differ <br />entiating areas which are currently prone to flood from those which <br />have not experienced flooding for over seventy-five years. <br />As a professional organization concerned with the protection <br />of private property rights of landowners in our county, we are <br />directly opposed to sweeping generalizations made by a distant <br />bureaucracy which has demonstrated its lack of knowledge of Indian <br />River County. On behalf of private property owners - individual <br />homeowners as well as citrus grove owners - we oppose the'iridiscrim- <br />inate use of meaningless terminology which, if left unchallenged, <br />may very well precipitate the loss of private property rights to <br />Indian River County landowners. <br />We therefore urge your support of our efforts to modify the <br />maps currently under review, so that they will correctly reflect <br />Indian River County's coastal barrier regions. <br />Respectfully, <br />Vero Beach -Indian River County <br />Board of Realtors <br />r <br />0�� <br />Charles E. Davis <br />Chairman <br />10 Legislative Committee <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.