My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/10/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
3/10/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:02:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/10/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ucK 49 PAtE.123 1 <br />MAR 101992 <br />developed, such as John's Island, are included as developed. <br />His personal feeling was that the whole plan should be <br />deleted and the government should relinquish these controls. <br />Commissioner Wodtke reported that on his recent trip to <br />Washington, he was specifically informed that a law has been <br />passed; it is going to be implemented; and they are going to <br />develop the rules and the map. He expressed great concern <br />about the seriousness of this situation and the lack of <br />interest shown in Washington. He continued that he had been <br />informed that a lot of this was done by satellite picture <br />with the result that Amelia Island north of Jacksonville, a <br />very high quality development which has retained a lot of <br />the natural vegetation, was shown as totally undeveloped. <br />Commissioner Wodtke agreed that we should have a strong <br />Resolution that will touch base on all the problems brought <br />out. <br />Commissioner Lyons felt we have to answer their <br />specific question on what is included according to their <br />definitions whether we like it or not, and then we fight <br />about the definitions. <br />Commissioner Fletcher believed there are two items that <br />have to -be addressed - the definitions and map correction. <br />He noted that the people have indicated correctly that the <br />federal government once again has demonstrated its ability <br />to be ineffectual at the local level. Commissioner Fletcher <br />asked if the Commission felt the hearing input reflected a <br />desire for the government to remain in the insurance <br />business. He noted that particular issue could be skirted <br />or it could be addressed if the Commission has the courage <br />to do so. <br />Question arose as to what the Department of Interior is <br />trying to accomplish by this action, and it was theorized <br />that since funds are short now for them to purchase and <br />preserve property under the "Save Our Coast" program, this <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.