My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/17/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
3/17/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:05:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/17/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAR 171982 O A19 Pkib,t'258 <br />Judge Smith and Judge Stikelether expressed deep concern over further delay in re- <br />moving and replacing the carpet in the courtroom so that it may be used for jury <br />trials that are forthcoming. Once work is completed, it should be kept in mind <br />that all persons who appear to be highly sensitive to the unknown cause of the <br />problem at the courthouse should be asked to use the County Courtroom fire escape <br />as an entrance and exit to the newly refurbished offices and courtroom in order to <br />avoid exposure. <br />On Wednesday, March 10, 1982, the only firm that had given us an estimate to remove <br />the carpet ($2,000.00) was called in to do the job. Once they removed the carpet, <br />we found that the most inexpensive way to remove the mastic from the floor was to <br />also remove the parquet flooring. Judge Stikelether was very concerned about any <br />chemicals which would be absorbed by applying direct to the parquet flooring. In <br />addition, the contractor indicated that to use chemicals would also soak around <br />the parquet and cause those tiles to come loose thus creating a more monumental <br />problem. It was C. B. HardinIsdecision to remove the parquet after Mr. Williams <br />conferred with the Judge and getting his concurrence. <br />3. REConv=ATIONS & FUNDING <br />A. It is recommended that staff contact The University of Florida, Gainesville! <br />and get their recommendation as to the type of experts needed to give a com- <br />plete review and an analysis of the cause of the health problems that con- <br />tinue to exist at the courthouse. <br />B. That the Board of County Commissioners request a written agreement from Judge <br />Smith and Judge Stikelether and all others involved with health problems, <br />that they will accept the team recommended by The University of Florida and <br />that those with medical problems directly, will disclose to the qualified <br />physician team members any prior or current medical information required by <br />that team so that they may successfully arrive at a determination of the <br />cause of the problem. <br />C. That staff be authorized to write bid specifications with Judges' concurrence <br />and to request bids for carpeting to replace that carpeting removed from the <br />county courtroom and the County Judges Offices. <br />D. That staff be authorized to write bid specifications with Judges' concurrence <br />and request bids to complete any and all alterations to return the county <br />courtroom and the county Judges offices to their original condition prior to <br />demolition. <br />E. Once all work has been completed that all entry to and from the north end of <br />the county courthouse by highly sensitized persons be made through the fire <br />escape leading into that section of the courthouse until such time as it would <br />appear no further action is required of the Board of County Commissioners. <br />F. That funding be paid out of the County Commission Contingency Account No. <br />102-199-584-99.91. <br />Dr. Hardin next read aloud the following letter <br />received from Industrial Hygienist Jack Radcliffe: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.