My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/21/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
4/21/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:13:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/21/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APR 211982 -�. 49 PAur 452 <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Fletcher to deny the appeal <br />of Joseph Fedele, and seconded by Commissioner Wodtke for <br />purposes of discussion. <br />Commissioner Wodtke noted that this area is located on the <br />ridge and is a water recharge area. He felt water is an <br />f <br />important problem and although it is a difficult decision in <br />regard to use of private property, he would feel more comfortable <br />if this area remained single family. <br />Chairman Scurlock noted that although we did talk in the <br />Land Use Element about transition area and this property is in <br />the area we said would be suitable for higher density, he felt <br />there could be problems with higher density at this particular <br />intersection. <br />Commissioner Bird also was concerned -that the South County <br />was one of the few areas designated under the Plan to go to <br />higher densities for affordable"housing, but noted that the <br />developer, in this instance, is not bound to a particular plan. <br />If we go to a higher density, he preferred a development that <br />will provide continuity of design for the multiple family. <br />Commissioner Lyons noted that actually all the Land Use Plan <br />says is that it will accommodate densities up to a certain point, <br />which does not mean you necessarily have to zone to that density. <br />The Chairman called for the question to deny the Fedele <br />appeal. It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />APPEAL BY C. S. RICHARDSON OF DENIAL OF REZONING REQUEST BY THE <br />PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION <br />The hour of 1:30 o'clock P.M. having passed, the Deputy <br />Clerk read the following Notice with Proof of Publication <br />attached, to -wit: <br />52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.