My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/19/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
5/19/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:26:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/19/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The chief advantage of Alternative #2 the bidding for additional <br />proposals regarding the preparation and submission of the Bi -Annual <br />Report would be that we could .negotiate with other firms and per- <br />haps obtain a fresh insight into the operation of the Landfill and <br />establish a proper relationship with -another firm. This may result <br />in lower overall costs in the future. <br />RECOAZIENDAT I ONS <br />It is recommended that the Board approve of the proposed addenda <br />to the basic agreement between the County and Post, Buckley, Schuh <br />and Jernigan. Transfer $15,000.00 from account #461-235-536-99.91 <br />(Board of County Commission Reserve for Contingency) to account <br />#411-217-534-33.13 for completion of this report. <br />Motion was, made by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by <br />Commissioner Lyons, that the Board approve the <br />recommendation of the Assistant County Administrator of the <br />proposed addendum to the basic agreement between the County <br />and Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan; and to transfer <br />$15,000 from account #461-235-536-99.91 to account <br />#411-217-534-33.13. <br />A brief discussion ensued. <br />Mr. Greene did not feel that the County should go out <br />and seek proposals as Post, Buckley, SchVh & Jernigan, Inc. <br />had the greatest familiarity with the Landfill. He advised <br />the County was also able to obtain a reduction in price for <br />their services. <br />The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on <br />and carried with a vote of 4 to 1, with Commissioner <br />Fletcher voting in opposition. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.