Laserfiche WebLink
BAS ,49 <br />MAY 1 91SL <br />the extent suggested by Commissioner Bird based on having <br />these costs analyzed in a more precise way in a year's time. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Bird, seconded by <br />Commissioner Lyons, that a franchise fee be established at <br />4 <br />1% of gross sales. <br />Commissioner Lyons believed we owe it to the consumers <br />to police a franchise. He felt 1% is too small a fee, but <br />stated he was willing to go along on an experimental basis. <br />Commissioner Wodtke took the position that he would <br />rather first have the experience to determine what this will <br />R <br />cost us and then have the right to put the fee on. He also <br />did not see where we need $5,000 if we have a $500 fee <br />established to hear a rate case. <br />Considerable discussion ensued with Commissioner <br />Fletcher arguing against penalizing free enterprise by <br />guessing at costs, and the Chairman emphasizing the <br />importance of allocating costs properly. <br />Commissioner Bird noted that we will incur expenses in <br />administering these franchises in the next year, and he <br />would rather make an estimate of these costs in advance than <br />go back and try to recoup. <br />After further discussion, Commissioners Bird and Lyons <br />reworded the Motion as follows: to agree to establish a <br />franchise fee of 1% of gross sales and, upon establishment <br />of such fee, to eliminate the $500 rate hearing fee. <br />William Koolage commented that as a taxpayer, he is <br />paying for the cost of the collector transfer stations and <br />since he is paying for his own garbage collection, he feels <br />that he is paying twice. <br />Commissioner Scurlock felt that point will be addressed <br />in budget sessions. t <br />The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on <br />and carried 3 to 2 with Commissioners Wodtke and Fletcher <br />voting in opposition. <br />