My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/19/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
5/19/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:26:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/19/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
He agreed that you would not want this occupation being <br />carried on in a regular residential district. <br />Chairman Scurlock believed the Commission has two <br />options - to live by the law, or if the law is not <br />appropriate, to change the law. <br />Commissioner Lyons agreed, but noted one problem is <br />that this is an artificial situation where you have a resi- <br />dential subdivision in an agricultural zone. <br />Discussion ensued as to the action being requested of <br />the Board, and Attorney Brandenburg explained that they are <br />asking for authority to institute suit to enforce the Zoning <br />Code. He concurred that the Board does have the option of <br />changing the Zoning Code so that this activity no longer <br />would be illegal. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if the decision that this was <br />not a home occupation was based on external noise"and <br />vehicular traffic. <br />Attorney Paull reported that complaints were received <br />in regard to noise made by the power saw, deliveries made by <br />large vehicles, additional wear and tear on the private <br />roads which the residents have to maintain, etc. If Mr. <br />Herold could carry on the same activity without audible <br />sounds and the need for large vehicles to -enter the <br />neighborhood, he did not feel there would be a problem. <br />Commissioner Wodtke asked if the ruling that cabinet <br />making is not a home occupation prevents anyone from making <br />cabinets in their home. <br />Commissioner Lyons felt it only applies if the cabinets <br />are offered for sale, and Attorney Paull listed the factors <br />in violation of the ordinance, i.e., Attorney Sullivan <br />admitted that Mr. Herold was building cabinets on the <br />premises and that he lists his name in the yellow pages, <br />which factors are plainly in contravention of the Ordinance. <br />.MAY 18 198 <br />95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.