6/2/1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JUN 21982 _ ®�oK 49 PAGE $9. hoped that the receiver would agree to properly disinfect this effluent, as they had a similar situation in Seminole County and it was treated successfully with chlorine. Attorney Brandenburg explained that he was considering the proper language to use for this paragraph under discussion. He added that basically, the County was to - acquire the sXptem and eventually work it into other systems, which was agreed to by the DER. This new requirement,to make improvements to a system that would not be used nine months from now, would prove to be costly to the County. The Attorney felt the Board would have to make a determination on this matter. Utilities Director Liner advised that it would take approximately $9,000 to gas chlorinate the system, which would involve doing a tap on the Oslo Road water main and running a line to the present system, since there is no water there now. Lengthy discussion followed regarding the possibility of having a shallow well with an electrical hook-up. Mr. Kozlov felt that a shallow well at that location would be ideal. He again stressed that.DER would require disinfectant of the secondary treatment. Commissioner Lyons was hopeful that a way could b found, within a reasonable cost, to change the situation for such a short interval. He urged the DER and the Board to have a little mutual faith. Attorney Brandenburg stated that consent orders were to allow a facility to operate until such time that complete improvements could be made. He continued that Mr. Kozlov was asking the Board to indicate that it will maintain a certain level of chlorine even though it may be physically impossible. The Attorney was hopeful that the DER would work with the County with respect to cleaning up this system and to allow this consent order.