Laserfiche WebLink
oQK ; 50_':08 <br />JUN 16 1982 <br />basis, and it was on a negotiated basis. He believed the <br />selection was narrowed down to three firms and that it <br />worked out very well that way. He noted that the negotiated <br />terms were not necessarily for a fixed amount since the - <br />second year the costs were lower. He believed this <br />procedure comes under the TRIM Bill and asked the Attorney <br />to elaborate. <br />Attorney Brandenburg informed the Board that Sec. 11.45 <br />of the Statutes establishes the Audit Selection'Board. Each <br />time auditing services are required, this must be <br />advertised. The Audit Selection Board then reviews each <br />firm to determine whether they are qualified; the top three <br />are selected and negotiations then are conducted <br />simultaneously with all three for a contract^... <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Lyons, seconded by <br />Commissioner Bird, to authorize the Audit Selection <br />Committee to proceed on a negotiated fee basis in selecting <br />a firm to conduct the County audit. <br />Attorney Brandenburg commented that the Committee <br />can determine which firms are..most qualified, but the Board. <br />of County Commissioners must negotiate. The language reads <br />that "the Board of County Commissioners shall simultaneously <br />negotiate with the recommended firms for auditing services <br />as well as negotiate the scope and quality of service." <br />Commissioner Lyons felt that while some firms will be <br />interested in working on a negotiated fee basis, some will <br />not. <br />Mr. Thomas noted that the agenda apparently is asking <br />that direction be given to the Audit Selection Committee to <br />proceed either on a negotiated fee or bid fee basis, and he <br />had some questions about professionals such as architects, <br />doctors, etc., taking part in a bid procedure. <br />