Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Wodtke pointed out that granting a <br />rezoning does not necessarily mean the property will be <br />developed to the maximum allowed, and noted, as an example, <br />that the land Mrs. Boland lives on is zoned for 6.2 units <br />per acre but only developed at 3. <br />Further discussion followed in regard to Mr. Childers' <br />development plan, and Mrs. Boland reiterated that she <br />opposes the proposed rezoning. <br />William Koolage of 26th Avenue was disturbed that any <br />consideration was given to rescheduling the advertised <br />hearing; he opposed continuations, which he felt tend to <br />discourage the public from giving input. He further <br />expressed concern about the fact that the CLUP shows MD -1 <br />for this area, which allgws up to 8 units per acre. He <br />believed that at the time of the CLUP hearings many citizens <br />did not understand what was taking place. <br />No one further wishing to be heard, ON MOTION by <br />Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED by Commissioner�Wodtke, <br />the Board unanimously closed the public hearing. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons that the <br />Childers' appeal be denied on the basis that <br />the proposed rezoning is inconsistent with the <br />single family character of the neighborhood. <br />There was no second. The Vice Chairman asked the <br />Attorney if there was any way the Chairman could second a <br />Motion and was informed the Chairman could pass the gavel <br />and then second the Motion. <br />Vice Chairman Fletcher passed the gavel to Commissioner <br />Lyons who thereupon took over as Acting Chairman. <br />JUN 16 1982 <br />THE MOTION WAS SECONDED by Commissioner Fletcher. <br />64 <br />50 pl if 65 <br />