Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman Scurlock reported that under the Statute, the <br />Audit Selection Committee is required to convey three or <br />more choices to the Board, but they chose to convey all <br />five. He informed the Board that these firms are all quite <br />equal, and he believed that the difference will be the <br />dollars required to provide the service. The Chairman noted <br />that the firms listed are not ranked, but merely set out in <br />alphabetical order. <br />Commissioner Bird felt that the work that has been done <br />so far is fine, but he personally would like to see it <br />carried a step further since he did not feel qualified to <br />listen to all five and analyze all the material presented; <br />he suggested that the Financial Committee or staff rank the <br />five and make further recommendations. <br />Chairman Scurlock stated that his recommendation would <br />be to refer this to the Finance Advisory Committee. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bird, the Board unanimously <br />referred the material of the five audit firms <br />proposed to the Finance Advisory Committee to <br />be further culled down to three and ranked in <br />order of preference for presentation to the <br />Board. <br />ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY - R. D. CARTER ROAD <br />The Board reviewed the memo and recommendation of <br />Assistant County Attorney Paull, as follows, in regard to <br />acquiring a parcel of right-of-way for R. D. Carter Road <br />from Dr. Dov Borovsky: <br />40 <br />JUL 14 1982 BOOK , 50; F* 484 <br />