My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/27/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
7/27/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:15:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/27/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL 2 7 198 a � � <br />Thomas believed that leaving Homewood Subdivision LD -1 and <br />having a buffer of RR -1 would be in the best interests of <br />the City of Fellsmere, as stated in his letter. <br />Irving Herris of Coral Gables, a part of the group <br />which owns a major .part of the subject property, next came <br />before the Board. Mr. Herris noted that when he attended <br />the last meeting in Sebastian re the Land Use Plan, he had <br />believed this was all finalized at that time. He explained <br />} <br />that since they considered the City of Fellsmere a <br />population node, they felt the logical thing would be for <br />the density to decline as it moved outward and go from LD -1 <br />to RR and then to Agricultural, consistent with the way it <br />is done in other area. He continued that this was planned, <br />but was emasculated at the Sebastian hearing. Mr. Herris <br />then talked about personal problems between himself and Joe <br />Suit and informed the Board that Mr. Suit made incorrect <br />statements in his letter since according to him there would <br />be 15 streets cutting through Homewood and that would be <br />impossible unless they built 15 culverts over Ditch 18. Mr. <br />Herris reported that they do -plan some development in the <br />near future, but there is no tremendous surge in demand for <br />land use there. He felt based on the Land Use Plan, the <br />major factor to be considered is consistency. <br />Discussion then ensued as to whether Homewood <br />Subdivision is actually subdivided, and Mr. Herris stated <br />that it was subdivided back in 1924 into lots about 2/3 of <br />an acre in size, but he did not know if it was recorded. <br />Zoning Director Walker stated that Homewood Subdivision <br />is unrecorded, and the plat shows the lots as being 2-1/2 <br />acres each. <br />Mr. Herris stated that he only knows what they bought <br />and are paying taxes on, which are basically 2/3 acre lots. <br />Discussion continued as to the total acreage involved, <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.