Laserfiche WebLink
and Mr. Herris stated some of it is in fish farms so that <br />actually about 300 acres are involved. <br />Discussion continued re the staff recommendation of <br />RR -1 for all of Homewood Subdivision. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Fletcher to accept <br />staff's recommendation of RR -1 for Homewood Subdivision. <br />The Motion died for lack of a second. <br />Mr. Challacombe explained that staff recommended RR -1, <br />or 1 unit per 2h acres, to coincide with the lot size. He <br />noted that there are no demand pressures in this area, and <br />there was concern expressed by the City of Fellsmere and the <br />people who came to the previous meeting. <br />Commissioner Wodtke believed that the City of Fellsmere <br />requested the change, but it now appears that they have <br />I <br />withdrawn that request and have basically said they would <br />like to consider extending RR -1 below Homewood Subdivision. <br />In further discussion, it was generally agreed that <br />there was some confusion as to what the City of Fellsmere <br />actually wanted. <br />Chairman Scurlock commented that at the meeting held in <br />Sebastian we came up with the concept of.the LD -1 just as it <br />appears on the map and the majority of the people seemed to <br />be happy with this; now it appears that we have some sort of <br />internal feud going, however. <br />Mr. Challacombe pointed out that whether we designated <br />this property RR -1 or LD -1, it is now zoned Agricultural and <br />to come in with a higher density would require a rezoning <br />request. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lyons, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Bird, to make no change in <br />the designation in which Homewood Subdivision is <br />included on the Land Use Map at this time. <br />24 Roof <br />J U L 2 7 1982 <br />