Laserfiche WebLink
J U L 2 7 1982 <br />0 �E �. <br />RE: Master Plan Change <br />PROPERTY: <br />Van Cortland Corporation <br />U. S. #1 South of Hobart Landing <br />I• <br />Orignial Zoning - R-3 and Cl -A <br />Allowed: 6 Single Residence per Acre <br />8 Duplex per Acre <br />15 Multi per Acre <br />II. <br />Suggested: L.D. 2 L. D. 1 _- <br />RR -2 <br />MPZ Allowing: 6 3." <br />1 <br />III• <br />Owner desires Clarification: <br />. <br />Property split after almost 10 years of ownership. <br />Why was line drawn on East side of U.S. 1 <br />dividing <br />property.into LD2 and LD1 when topography <br />is identical. <br />Groves begin South. <br />This line was not exercised on West side. <br />Owner is out <br />of the country but has Florida attorney. <br />There is <br />a <br />contract on this property contingent upon <br />zoning. <br />Therefore, <br />it's imperative we.have an answer soon! <br />IV. <br />Purchaser wants Clarification: Can he build 200 <br />Units <br />East of <br />Route 1? <br />V. <br />l <br />This has been in limbo for 1:2 years and after <br />numerous <br />meetings <br />with City and Zoning and Planning Officials no <br />one has <br />given us <br />a workable answer. <br />VI. <br />What are the boundaries outlines of the Industrial Node <br />suggested? <br />Should this not be West of the RR only? <br />Will any Commercial remain? <br />Ms. Ada Miner came before the Board representing the <br />owner, the Van Cortland Corporation, and stated that <br />actually many owners are involved. This land was original <br />zoned R-3 and C -1A. Hobart is to the north and the property <br />goes to the river. She stated she was.speaking about the <br />piece on the east which was divided into LD -1 and LD -2 on <br />the Section line, the LD -2 being to the north, and the LD -1 <br />to the south. <br />31 <br />