My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/27/1982
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1982
>
7/27/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 2:15:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/27/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
J t1 L 2'7 1982 50 43, <br />Commissioner Bird felt that this is really the eleventh <br />hour. He stressed that we have discussed this particular <br />area before for many hours; we noted Mrs. Robinson's concern <br />previously; and that is why we delineated the environmen- <br />tally sensitive area here. The property owners went along <br />with us and proceeded to this point believing the map <br />reflected the Commission's attitude to the area. He <br />believed a great majority of this' County falls in the 100 <br />year flood plain, and with the MD -1 category, he felt the <br />Commission will look very carefully at the characteristics <br />of any land requested to be rezoned. <br />The Board generally agreed they could not make a change <br />such as this without a public hearing involving that <br />particular area, and it was noted that this area will be <br />revisited when the zoning requests come in. <br />Commissioner Lyons withdrew his second, and the Motion <br />died for lack of a second. <br />Commissioner Fletcher stated that he did not need the <br />100 year Flood Map to tell him where it gets wet in the <br />County and he believed that area should be changed. He con- <br />curred with Mrs. Robinson that by leaving the land in this <br />designation, we are misleading the public by allowing them <br />to assume this land will support more than it actually will. <br />EXPANSION OF 50 ACRE ROSELAND HOSPITAL/COMMERCIAL NODE AND <br />40 ACRE SEBASTIAN COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL NODE <br />Planning Manager Challacombe reported that since the <br />last meeting when several questions were raised by property <br />owners in the vicinity of the above nodes, staff has done <br />some research and found that, including the approved site <br />plan of the Sebastian River.Medical Plaza, the total number <br />of acres now being used in the Hospital node is approxi- <br />mately 36.08 out of a potential 50. This, combined with the <br />fact.that we have lost the 40 acres of the Sebastian node <br />due to annexation by the City, does not leave a whole lot of <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.