Laserfiche WebLink
AUG 101992 wK 50 wc� 8SI <br />Gemberling's situation and that to change the designation at <br />this time would be a major thing and affect a lot of people. <br />Question arose as to the consequences of having <br />commercial property in a strictly industrial node, and <br />Mr. Challacombe felt Mr. Gemberling would have to come in <br />for a rezoning from C-lA to industrial. <br />Commissioner Bird felt we should change the node to an <br />industrial/commercial node because of the present mixed <br />development in this area. He believed if we were changing <br />from industrial just to commercial or vice versa, it might <br />be a problem, but that to change it to industrial/commercial <br />would not adversely affect any property owners. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Wodtke, to change the 50 acre <br />,,Industrial Node in the Gifford area to an <br />Industrial/Commercial Node. <br />Discussion continued as to the present mix of uses in <br />this district, and it was pointed out that if the node <br />remains all industrial, it will restrict everything east of <br />U.S.1, where there is a good deal of existing commercial, to <br />industrial. <br />Commissioner Lyons commented that he now had been <br />convinced that by making the node Industrial/Commercial, we <br />would be making it better for the people. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. <br />It was voted on and carried unanimously. <br />ITEM #5 MR. & MRS. MOSCHEL (Margaret Mann Blanton) <br />Planning Manager Challacombe read the following letter <br />from Attorney Margaret Blanton of the firm of Samuel A. <br />Block: <br />8 <br />